Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/David J. Schindler - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KleenupKrew (talk | contribs) at 20:44, 30 April 2008 (David J. Schindler: delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:44, 30 April 2008 by KleenupKrew (talk | contribs) (David J. Schindler: delete)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

David J. Schindler

David J. Schindler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Multiple issues. WP:COATRACK article on non-notable attorney shot through with copyright violations. Justallofthem (talk) 17:31, 30 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Weak keep. Those were some high-profile cases he prosecuted as an AUSA. I don't see that his private practice has kept him notable, but notability doesn't expire. It's a terrible article, though, and doesn't need to rehash each and every case (assuming that isn't the copyvio part). --Dhartung | Talk 19:12, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as apparent WP:COPYVIO and WP:COATRACK article. The article is hardly about Schindler at all, it is about several cases he was (somehow) connected to but says little about his actual role in them. Some of those cases are notable and have their own articles, some are not. KleenupKrew (talk) 20:44, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Categories: