Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Imperial Mark - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by DavidFarmbrough (talk | contribs) at 08:57, 15 August 2005 ([]: add original talk page comments). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:57, 15 August 2005 by DavidFarmbrough (talk | contribs) ([]: add original talk page comments)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Imperial Mark

Very likely an advertisement, no apparent notability. See also comments on talk page. Sandstein 10:14, 14 August 2005 (UTC)

  • Delete as unverifiable, if nothing else. --Apyule 12:02, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per above --Lomedae 13:11, August 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete My comments on the talk page were: Is there any independent source for this? Most of the information seems to be lifted directly from the commercial web site. Doing a Google check shows various press releases from the company behind the Imperial Mark, but nothing AFAICS from anyone independent. A news item such as this: originates from IC, the International Charter Organisation themselves. A search of Omega's own site reveals no mention of the Mark, there is likewise nothing on the Harrods site, nor as far as I can see on the Rolex site. DavidFarmbrough 09:00 (BST) 15 Aug 2005