This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Aquatiki (talk | contribs) at 16:44, 20 May 2008 (keep). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:44, 20 May 2008 by Aquatiki (talk | contribs) (keep)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)LyricWiki
AfDs for this article:- LyricWiki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
While this website claims to be the "7th largest wiki with over 670,000 pages" it does not meet our standards for verifiability and lacks independent, non-trivial coverage by reliable, third party publishers. Coccyx Bloccyx (talk) 18:08, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- The External links policy forbids linking to sites which violate copyright. An entire article about a site which violates copyright seems majorly iffy. Unless there were some really important reliable sources on this, such as lawsuits, takedown notices, etc., then this is not a page we should have. Delete. See International Lyrics Server for what we could talk about. Corvus cornixtalk 18:22, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment: The article was recently stripped of most of its content in order to cleanup the page and find sources. If you need a list of sources that have covered LyricWiki, see LyricWiki:In the Press. --WillMak050389 18:26, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
- Delete. Non-notable wiki. KleenupKrew (talk) 00:47, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't see how anyone could call this non-notable unless they simply use that word as a Maoist hammer on articles they don't like. Get rid of the external link if you want, but a site with nearly a million hits a day, with millions of pages, and in constant use by several programs to obtain lyrics (Amarok, WinAmp, foobar2000, LyricsFinder11) it noteworthy. Object all you want to the site's content, but that's no reason to delete the article. --Aquatiki (talk) 16:44, 20 May 2008 (UTC)