Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Scjessey (talk | contribs) at 23:10, 10 June 2008 (→June 2008 - edit warring: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Hello WorkerBee74, and Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Alison 23:52, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to edit a page Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Misplaced Pages Community Portal Follow Misplaced Pages etiquette Practice civility

Thank you Alison.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Kossack4Truth for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.

Attacks

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Barack Obama. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you.

Accusing those who disagree with your POV of being campaign volunteers or staffers is unacceptable. Shem 23:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)

tendentious editing - for this further edit and many others. You are edit warring on an important talk page, and behaving in a tendentious way. When you make an edit with the stated purpose of changing the slant of an article about a presidential candidate, referring to those who disagree with you as "campaign volunteers" you are not editing the encyclopedia constructively. If you do not stop it seems likely that you will be blocked from further editing. Wikidemo (talk) 16:45, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Request for your opinion

		Please Vote For Change We Can Believe In Or Even No Change at Obama Article
		Requesting your final opinion on the Bill Ayers language You previously !voted (here) on what language to use at the Barack Obama page. We're trying to get a consensus now. Please take another look at how the discussion has progressed (especially here) and consider what option might make the best consensus, then !vote again at Talk:Barack Obama#Call the question after detailed discussion: Option 3 or not?. Please keep in mind the discussion has been long, so if you can accept what seems to be a likely option, please do. This is one of Misplaced Pages's most prominent articles. Thank you. Noroton (talk) 23:41, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

Stop it

Please stop sockpuppeting. You're only ruining any good cause to improve any articles that might otherwise be improved. The Evil Spartan (talk) 17:03, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

Blocked

I have blocked you for 24 hours for repeated disruption despite numerous warnings. Raul654 (talk) 18:09, 7 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008 - edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Barack Obama. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. This is just a friendly warning to remind you that your next reversion will take you over the limit, although given the tendentious nature of your edits, some administrators might feel you have already been sufficiently disruptive to warrant a block. -- Scjessey (talk) 23:10, 10 June 2008 (UTC)