Misplaced Pages

User talk:Robert McClenon/Crisis

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< User talk:Robert McClenon

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Robert McClenon (talk | contribs) at 08:50, 28 August 2005 (remove Famekeeper comment from here to deleted nonsense). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:50, 28 August 2005 by Robert McClenon (talk | contribs) (remove Famekeeper comment from here to deleted nonsense)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Solutions?

Robert, I only read part of what you wrote on the main page here, but I agree that things could be improved and that ideally mediation would come before user conduct RFCs.

Maybe we should start Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution reform? Maurreen (talk) 00:50, 28 August 2005 (UTC)

Here are a couple ideas, food for thought:
  1. Enlarge or otherwise change ArbComm so it can hear more cases more quickly.
  2. Invent a new designation -- maybe "caseworker". These people would be empowered and possibly have the duty to resolve any disagreements as they see fit. Think of them as combining the functions of a mediator and enforcer. They would need to be approved by at least 90 percent of those voting. Maurreen (talk) 01:11, 28 August 2005 (UTC)