This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Knowledgeum (talk | contribs) at 17:34, 24 July 2008 (Undid revision 227590637 by 61.69.2.251 (talk) undo image resizing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:34, 24 July 2008 by Knowledgeum (talk | contribs) (Undid revision 227590637 by 61.69.2.251 (talk) undo image resizing)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Pronunciation
Not at all of any real importance, but is your username intended to be pronounced Thrindel, like "thimble", or Thrindel like the Spanish word "el"? GoatDoomOcculta (talk) 21:55, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Like 'thimble'--Thrindel (talk) 22:24, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Ctrl+Alt+Del
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Ctrl+Alt+Del. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. You have made three reverts to the article now. I recommend you stop. Artichoker 02:13, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
- You're right, I will seek third part arbitration to prevent this from escalating further.--Thrindel (talk) 02:17, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
Good Work
Well I don't know how many people you are pleasing, but I'm very happy that you keep an eye on Ctrl+Alt+Del, keep up the good work, and don't listen to anyone on the internet who has figured out the "scoop" on "who you really are" they clearly only have one track vandal minds. Edits are fleeting, bans are forever. Knowledgeum (talk) 07:57, 22 July 2008 (UTC)
Bias against Pakistan
Is it islamophobia which drives editors against pakistan or just pro indian bias stop deleting pakistani history unfairly india was born in 1947 just like pakistan get that into your head. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.158.129.53 (talk) 20:38, 23 July 2008 (UTC)
- It has nothing to do with "anti-Pakistani" this or "pro-Indian" that, it's about presenting straight facts in an encyclopedic article. Based on your edit summaries and edits, it seems more like you're the one with the cultural chip on your shoulder. I was simply undoing a removal of information that several other editors on the article seem to support. "To hell with India" does not sound like unbiased editing to me. Taxila may be Pakistani now, but if it was once Indian (as my cursory research and sources already cited in the article suggests), that should be mentioned in the article as well, regardless of your feelings on India or your pride for Pakistan.--Thrindel (talk) 04:39, 24 July 2008 (UTC)
What do you mean India do you mean Hindustan, Bharat or british india this is a joke india came into exsistance in 1947 before then it was a land named 100 times so get your pro india bias out the way and stop your islamophobe attack on muslim nations. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.158.177.226 (talk) 11:29, 24 July 2008 (UTC)