Misplaced Pages

User talk:Stayfi

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Stayfi (talk | contribs) at 20:16, 24 July 2008 (July 2008). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 20:16, 24 July 2008 by Stayfi (talk | contribs) (July 2008)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
  • We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian!

82.101.143.211

Don't edit war the same article as an an anonymous and logged in user. Санта Клаус (talk) 19:55, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

July 2008

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of previously published material to our articles as you apparently did to Arabic Misplaced Pages. Please cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. --Rodhullandemu 01:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

  • This isn't n original research, you can always take look to the articles about mohamed and the vagina, i'll add the in references. it will better also, if u coud understand arabic. i'll try to get a hand ffrom 3 israelis who could. regards --Stayfi (talk) 09:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
I don't feel inclined to unprotect Arabic Misplaced Pages at present due the the flood of apparent sockuppets adding this information, and, who, incidentally, I am about to block. Put your references on the article's Talk page please, and let them be judged for reliability. Thanks. --Rodhullandemu 14:43, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

لا أعتقد أن أحدا سيرضخ لطلبي، أنا أنصحك أن تأخذ فترة إجازة وتريح نفسك ثم حاول أن تصلح الأمور وتكسب ثقة المجتمع من جديد --Osm agha (talk) 16:38, 21 July 2008 (UTC)

Greetings. Although we encourage everyone to seek dispute resolution when necessary, a recent report you made to WP:AN appeared to be redundant. Every time you make a report to a noticeboard, it takes time away from other editors and administrators in order to examine the report. Repeated reports are disruptive and may be considered a form of forum shopping. Thank you. --Jaysweet (talk) 20:09, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

  • So...what? Jaysweet, u can always ignore it, no? nd let others see/do, what u don't hav time to see/do (it's relative dear) (there isn't just one admin, nd this is why we're calling many opinions) --Stayfi (talk) 20:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)