This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mshecket (talk | contribs) at 23:09, 10 November 2005 (I would not merge with psuedoscience). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:09, 10 November 2005 by Mshecket (talk | contribs) (I would not merge with psuedoscience)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This article was nominated for deletion on 3 September 2005. The result of the discussion was no consensus, keep with possible merge with pseudoscience. |
I would not merge with psuedoscience
Merging this article with pseudoscience would suggest that all science is either unanimously accepted (Science with a capital "S") or it's not science at all (pseudoscience), with no allowance for a gray area where developing and competing theories can stew while we try to figure out which of the former categories it belongs to. What areas of study belong to "controversial science" as opposed to "psuedoscience" is another story. There are definitely some theories (such as intelligent design) about which there is no real scientific controversy. --- Mike 23:09, 10 November 2005 (UTC)