Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2008 August 12

< Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs) at 16:40, 12 August 2008 (→Image:HMS Conqueror (S48).jpg: re). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:40, 12 August 2008 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk | contribs) (→Image:HMS Conqueror (S48).jpg: re)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

< August 11	August 13 >

August 12

Image:The_Yojiki_Baby_Swagbag.pdf

Image:The_Yojiki_Baby_Swagbag.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Yojikids (notify | contribs).

Not used, blatant advertising. Sherool (talk) 00:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Delete per nom. — BQZip01 — 04:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Grammy Award.jpg

Image:Grammy Award.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Music2611 (notify | contribs).

This rationale does not explain how the use will not effect commercial gain or declare why it cannot be replaced by a freely licensed image. ViperSnake151 01:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep Though fair use needs to be updated, that is not a reason for deletion. Simply showing the statue/trophy for purposes of identification is appropriate in this instance. — BQZip01 — 04:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep, I've updated the fair use rationale. Music2611 (talk) 13:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Pachelbels Canon In D II.ogg

Image:Pachelbels Canon In D II.ogg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WMC2007 (notify | contribs).

Copyrighted audio sample, exceeds fair use at 3:28 minutes. Sandstein 05:58, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

scan of artwork by john wood (doesn't seem to be the uploader) Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:50, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Old_Chickamauga_Town.jpg

Image:Old_Chickamauga_Town.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Natty4bumpo (notify | contribs).

halftoning suggests this is a scan, not an original photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Quatsino.jpg

Image:Quatsino.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gesso7 (notify | contribs).

somehow i doubt the uploader is the copyright holder on this satellite imagery Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:QuirkycastleLunar.jpg

Image:QuirkycastleLunar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danny_Flynn (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 06:59, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Quiver-1.jpg

Image:Quiver-1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ownersrep (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:00, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:QTQ1966.png

Image:QTQ1966.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Eddie_Blake (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:03, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:DaveyBoySmith012.jpg

Image:DaveyBoySmith012.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Padillo (notify | contribs).

A professionally posed image of a wrestler who has been dead for six years that was officially taken sometime in the nineties which has been uploaded under GFDL by a Filipino editor living in the Phillipines with a history of uploading images with fake licenses. Suffice to say I am not exactly likely to believe these circumstances. –– Lid 07:09, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:L_f085da2816b4ba86a007d8a6ed56b0d7.jpg

Image:L_f085da2816b4ba86a007d8a6ed56b0d7.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Danielt812 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LDS_hymnals_1.JPG

Image:LDS_hymnals_1.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Papabear165 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LDS_hymnals_2.JPG

Image:LDS_hymnals_2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Papabear165 (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:16, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LED_EscapingSilence.jpg

Image:LED_EscapingSilence.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hempdiddy (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:18, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LEITCH.jpg

Image:LEITCH.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Merrittcentennials (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LHH_Catastrophe_unit.jpg

Image:LHH_Catastrophe_unit.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Myscienceistight (notify | contribs).

no reason given for image to be PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LHH_Stertzer_heart.jpg

Image:LHH_Stertzer_heart.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Myscienceistight (notify | contribs).

no reason given for image to be PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:22, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LHH_Churchill_wheelchair.jpg

Image:LHH_Churchill_wheelchair.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Myscienceistight (notify | contribs).

no reason given for image to be PD Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:23, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LHS_Logo_SHADOW.gif

Image:LHS_Logo_SHADOW.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Davedoty (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LIOGOS.jpg

Image:LIOGOS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by MKSGRNS (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:27, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LIONEL_DEJEAN_WS2M_MODEL_AGENCY.jpg

Image:LIONEL_DEJEAN_WS2M_MODEL_AGENCY.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Arthurknight (notify | contribs).

ridiculously tiny image, i really doubt this was taken by the uploader Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LJ.JPG

Image:LJ.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PGAD (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LJB_Headshot_2006.jpg

Image:LJB_Headshot_2006.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LJBerman (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LJM.JPG

Image:LJM.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by PGAD (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, probably copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LNRpic1.jpg

Image:LNRpic1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Loonertheband (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic, likely copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:30, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:LMMakai.jpg

Image:LMMakai.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by LMMakai (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 07:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Hollys.jpg

Image:Hollys.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Padillo (notify | contribs).

Image fails NFCC#8 in that it does not significantly add to readers understanding. Compared to other images in the two articles using it, it is simply decorative and fails the fair-use requirements - Peripitus (Talk) 07:36, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Erica D'Ormus.jpg

Image:Erica D'Ormus.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by OoOKT (notify | contribs).

Orphaned, unecyclopedic Yopie 12:08, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:-p-MicronesiaYapGS.jpg

Image:-p-MicronesiaYapGS.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kintetsubuffalo (notify | contribs).

Claimed as "historic image", but no historical significance of the scene shown, let alone the image as such, is being described or even hinted at in the article (Scouting in the Federated States of Micronesia). Clearly replaceable with a free photograph of a present-day scout group. Image is not the subject of discussion in the article; even if it were, it doesn't convey any visual information that an image of a present-day group couldn't convey just as well. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:00sep29Paulk.jpg

Image:00sep29Paulk.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fireplace (notify | contribs).

Fails NFCC#1+8: Snapshot of a person caught in a compromising situation that earned him some notoriety. The person is only seen from the back; the fact that made the image notorious (that he was leaving a gay bar) is not seen on the image at all. No piece of visual information in this image is important to understand the article; in fact, everything that the image presumably represents not only can but must be expressed in the text, because the image doesn't contribute to understanding it at all. Fut.Perf. ☼ 13:57, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:HMS Conqueror (S48).jpg

Image:HMS Conqueror (S48).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SoLando (notify | contribs).

This image had to be removed from several articles:
British naval forces in the Falklands War,
Royal Navy Submarine Service
Churchill class submarine
HMS Conqueror (S48)

It is currently orphaned but editors want it back, so I'm bringing it here. There has been some debate with local editors arguing the importance of the image at Talk:British naval forces in the Falklands War#Image:HMS Conqueror (S48).jpg

This is a photograph of an historic British submarine, taken at an historic moment (the submarine is coming back from the Falklands War after having sunk an Argentinian cruiser). However, it fails NFCC#8 in that it makes no actual contribution, as an image, to understanding what it claims to represent. Editors who have been defending it as an "historic image" make a very typical mistake: they confuse the historical importance of a situation with the practical importance of an image for understanding it. This photograph may, for them, have symbolic importance in "representing" the notable historic situation; for the reader who isn't already familiar with the case, it represents nothing. There is no visual information in this image that actually helps the reader to understand the situation it is associated with. Anything this image is claimed to stand for has to be first explained to the reader through text before he can even begin to appreciate what it's about; once that is done, the text has rendered the image superfluous.

Apart from the symbolic historical significance, illustration of the concrete physical appearance of the submarine doesn't constitute grounds for keeping, since it could be replaced with free images of identical sister ships, and/or with an existing image that shows it at a later date, after its decommissioning.

It has additionally been claimed that a tiny visual detail makes it crucial: it is argued that the submarine is flying a "Jolly Roger" flag as a sign of its "kill". However, this detail is hardly visible on the image at all; it can still be adequately explained and covered by text alone; and the significance of that detail (which some British marine insider editors seem to think an awful lot of) is currently entirely unsourced and original research. Fut.Perf. ☼ 14:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

The so-called replacement picture Image:Warspiteconquerorvaliant.jpg is a great picture for Ships Cemetery or Disarmament articles - not for the only nuclear submarine which sank a ship in wartime. I am neither an Argentinean nor a Briton so I'm pretty neutral. Please insert Image:HMS Conqueror (S48).jpg again. The other picture is like illustrating John F. Kennedy's article with his tomb stone. --Regards, Necessary Evil (talk) 15:21, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

If you want an image of what the submarine physically looked like, go and take a free photo of its identical sister ship, which is apparently a well-preserved museum ship somewhere in Britain. It's not as if any visual difference between the two would be significant for the article, would it? And you are still making that logical mistake: "being the only nuclear submarine which sank a ship in wartime" is not something you can illustrate anyway, so why quote it as an argument here? You want to treat image-worthiness as a function of how important the object of the image is. That's not how NFCC#8 works. We don't include images because they are somehow associated with something important, we include them if and where they teach us something, concrete, visual, about it. This one doesn't. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:32, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry but that argument is completely and utterly ridiculous, "shove in any old image of the same type of submarine and that'll do" seems to be what you're arguing. Is this supposed to be an encyclopedia or not? That image is iconic and illustrates a significant event, its there to educate the reader and does so. Justin talk 15:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

There was no need to remove it from the articles mentioned, it was a perfectly justifiable use in accordance with wikipedia policies. It was removed and continued to be removed in spite of objections by other editors, clearly a consensus had not been reached.

The image in question documents a historical event; namely the return of HMS Conqueror from the Falklands War. HMS Conqueror is the only nuclear submarine to have ever sunk a warship in a conflict and so the event is notable of its right for that alone. The event is further notable because the sinking of the ARA Belgrano resulted in the withdrawal of the Argentine navy from further participation in the war. The event is also notable because it is credited with ending peace efforts as Argentina used the event as a pretext to withdraw from further talks aimed at preventing the war.

The tiny detail referred to is the flying of a Jolly Roger. The flying of such a flag is a traditon of the Royal Navy submarine service that dates from the first world war (when all submariners were branded pirates). As HMS Conqueror is the only nuclear submarine and only the second submarine since World War 2 to have sank a warship this is again a unique event for which no other image can be used. Merely covering this in the text alone does not adequately describe it in context; that is provided by the image. The flying of the flag also re-inforces certain South American stereotypes that describe the British as "piratas", and is frequently commented upon in Argentina. None of this is original research, provides plenty of examples as to why this is a unique event.

The image is used in part to illustrate the Royal Navies contribution to the Falklands War. It is simply unbelievable that one of the pivotal events in the Falklands War is not an iconic moment or worthy of inclusion in an article about the Royal Navies contribution to the Falklands War. This image is necessary for that purpose, it has been more than adequately justified and clearly satisfies NFCC#8 as it is a significant iconic image that enhances readers appreciation of the topic. It also satisfies NFCC#1 as no free equivalent is available; HMS Conqueror is now decommissioned and the event rather obviously will not be repeated. Justin talk 15:28, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll repeat this until people finally understand it: You are still only arguing about the importance of the situation. When will you start talking about the contribution of the image to understanding the situation? That contribution is close to zero. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:34, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Err, no that is your opinion and as someone once said to me, strongly held opinions do not triumph over wikipedia policies. A rationale has been provided, its an iconic image, its in accordance with wikipedia policies and in my opinion it should stay. You have not provided any concrete evidence to overcome consensus. Clearly the image is there to document a unique event, something that words alone would not convey and the image does so very effectively. Justin talk 15:51, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Saying so don't make it so. You wont't get away that easily: you need to explain how it contributes. Exactly what is it that it conveys that text couldn't? Name it. Describe it. Simply asserting just won't work. And no, it is not iconic. That, too, would need to be documented, with sourced discussion in the text. The websites that deal with the scene are either Misplaced Pages mirrors, or non-notable sites such as blogs, or they in fact use different images (same scene but different photograph). If other images can be used for the same scene, that's definitely not what "iconic" is about. Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Please point me at an image that illustrates the iconic moment when HMS Conqueror returns from the Falklands War, flying the Jolly Roger. All the other images you refer to would be none free content as well and you'd argue against them. Looking at your contribution history all you seem to do is remove NFCC images from wikipedia. It would appear that you have got somewhat mission orientated and don't appear to comprehend you've made a mistake on this occasion. You're pouncing on any contribution that contradicts you with minutes and you seem to be taking people objecting to your actions very personally.

I have set out repeatedly set out for you why the event is unique and iconic, anyone familiar with the Falklands War would agree with my synopsis. If you want to have a citation well online you can check , otherwise I'd recommend Hastings, Max; Simon Jenkins (1983). "Chapter 9", The Battle for the Falklands. Bungay, Suffolk: Book Club Associates, p. 147. So instead of simply trying to undermine what I am saying to you, please take a moment and digest the information instead of looking for avenues to attack and undermine me.

It is utterly iconic image for the Falklands War, its one of a number of images that are so and when I created the Montage for Falklands War I used it in one of the prototypes I put together. If you're unfamiliar with the war then I suggest you should think about respecting the contribution of editors who've made significant contributions to these articles and who are very familiar with the material and are looking to work towards helping readers achieve a better understanding of the conflict. Justin talk 16:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

I'll repeat this until you finally understand it: You are still only arguing about the importance of the situation. When will you start talking about the contribution of the image to understanding the situation? (By the way, if that museum you point to has the "jolly roger" on permanent display, you could go there and take a free photo of the Jolly Roger. Wouldn't that be a much better way of illustrating the scene?). And you still haven't illustrated how the photograph is iconic. If it was, wouldn't that museum be showing it? Fut.Perf. ☼ 16:40, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Delete: A very obvious NFCC #8 violation. This image does not augment the text at all in any way. howcheng {chat} 16:19, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep: The text on the image page is not that helpful, the use of the image in the context of the pages where it was used provide justification. The image does significantly augment the text, without the image the article is no where near as informative. Justin talk 16:33, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Imslayout.PNG

There is an .svg image that provides better quality. This image should be deleted. 209.2.60.98 (talk) 14:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Brewers-76sked.JPG

Image:Brewers-76sked.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Benrouse03 (notify | contribs).

Contains copyrighted logo. I suspect the uploader took a photo of a board/banner or something, but that does not mean that they have the right to release it into the public domain. J Milburn (talk) 15:01, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:CW Building.jpg

Image:CW Building.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ConceptWave (notify | contribs).

The size, silly shape, lack of meta-data and lack of explicit sourcing is leading me to believe this has been taken from elsewhere on the 'net. J Milburn (talk) 15:12, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Fahne oberjosbach0001.jpg

Image:Fahne oberjosbach0001.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Image:SAVEMentmore.jpg

Image:SAVEMentmore.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Catherine_de_Burgh (notify | contribs).

Book cover, but this book is not discussed in the article, nor does the addition of the cover increase reader understanding in any way. howcheng {chat} 16:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)
Keep - This image is also intended for use in another page that is currently under development in userspace, which discusses this campaign extensively; as the image is fair use, it cannot be placed into the article until the move to mainspace. Risker (talk) 16:25, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Mtloosemore1.jpg

Image:Mtloosemore1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pauljoffe (notify | contribs).

OR, UE, possible CV - Non-notable parody, and contains link to uploader's own site. Claims to be derivative work of copyright free images, but source information is not made specific. Mosmof (talk) 16:26, 12 August 2008 (UTC)