This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Sandstein (talk | contribs) at 22:48, 16 November 2008 (→Clerical comments on the proposed decision: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:48, 16 November 2008 by Sandstein (talk | contribs) (→Clerical comments on the proposed decision: new section)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Arbitrators active on this case
- To update this listing, edit this template and scroll down until you find the right list of arbitrators. If updates to this listing do not immediately show, try purging the cache.
Clerical comments on the proposed decision
If I may, a few suggestions:
- In finding 4, "Regrettable" should not be capitalised.
- In finding 6.1, "the Russian regime" should read "the Russian government", because the choice of the pejorative (to my ears) term "regime" may create the appearance of prejudice, particularly given the context of the case.
- In finding 10, I suggest that "fear-mongering" be replaced with a term more in keeping with the measured tone expected from an Arbitration Committee decision.
I have no opinion on the merits of the case, or of the proposed decision. Sandstein 22:48, 16 November 2008 (UTC)