This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Ret.Prof (talk | contribs) at 01:07, 13 September 2008 (→Adam Internet). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 01:07, 13 September 2008 by Ret.Prof (talk | contribs) (→Adam Internet)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Adam Internet
- Adam Internet (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
The article has 3 reliable sources but the article fails to state notability. Bidgee (talk) 00:27, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. —Bidgee (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep because the article claims the company has 100+ staff and 75,000+ customers; I think this constitutes an assertion of notability.--S Marshall /Cont 01:14, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Article claims of the number of staff and customers it has doesn't make it notable. Bidgee (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- I don't get the objection to this article at all, then. Coverage in reliable sources is what makes something notable, and you agree in your nomination that Adam Internet has reliable sources. So what's the problem?--S Marshall /Cont 03:34, 12 September 2008 (UTC)
- Keep but more work is needed--Ret.Prof (talk) 01:07, 13 September 2008 (UTC)