Misplaced Pages

User talk:Resess

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Zigger (talk | contribs) at 23:52, 16 November 2008 (3RR warning). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.

Revision as of 23:52, 16 November 2008 by Zigger (talk | contribs) (3RR warning)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Your WP 3O request

Your request for a third opinion did not comply with Misplaced Pages:Third opinion#How to list a dispute and has been removed. You may discuss the issues with the other editors on Talk:Paul Pantone. (Note: "as of January 2008" in the intro refers to the most recent date when it was known.) — Athaenara 17:46, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

The following was posted (diff) on my user talk page:

Hello,
Thanks for taking a look, I do remember when Pantone was locked away. I also added 2 sources. They come from further down the article. I don't think my memory failed me. Now that it's been added to the article 3 times could you explain where Jan 2008 comes from? I find it to be rather confusing. It is wrong and I don't see any source?
Here is the link.
http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Paul_Pantone&diff=prev&oldid=251989797
Resess (talk) 17:59, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

I forwarded it here, and recommend, as before, that you discuss these issues on Talk:Paul Pantone* with the other editors who have been active on the page. Thank you. — Athaenara 18:05, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

( * Talk:Paul Pantone#Edit warring and possible misunderstanding.) Athaenara 18:15, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Edit-warring on Paul Pantone

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. --Zigger «º» 23:52, 16 November 2008 (UTC)