This is an old revision of this page, as edited by William M. Connolley (talk | contribs) at 22:16, 25 November 2008 (→AN3: reply). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 22:16, 25 November 2008 by William M. Connolley (talk | contribs) (→AN3: reply)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)| User | Talk | Edits | Pinboard | Drafts | Articles | Projects |
 Archives |
| Prof. Anton Komaroff (2007): "None of the participants in creating the 1988 CFS case definition and name ever expressed any concern that it might TRIVIALISE the illness. We were insensitive to that possibility and WE WERE WRONG." |
| Prof. Malcolm Hooper (2007): "The simplest test for M.E. is just to say to the patient ‘stand over there for ten minutes’." |
Dutch ME/CFS patient survey
The results of the ME/CFS patient survey conducted by NIVEL in co-operation with the patient organizations have arrived and are expected to become public around December 15, 2008. Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 19:27, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
| Martin Luther King: "Everything that we see is a shadow cast by that which we do not see." |
User:Guido den Broeder/Navigation Footer
AN3
I've rejected your an3 report, for reasons I've given there. I believe your report was unreasonable. Please don't try to solve your edit conflicts through AN3, its not what its for. I've noted your being reported to ANI for vexatious litigation; be warned that continuing this way will be seen as such. You're welcome to continue discussing this either here or on my talk William M. Connolley (talk) 19:14, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have no way of knowing beforehand whether a report is going to be rejected, so basically you're saying that I should never again make a report but instead simply allow my every edit to be reverted without protest. Guido den Broeder (talk, visit) 21:57, 25 November 2008 (UTC) - that wasn't a helpful or accurate thing to say. Nor was your 3RR report accurate. Its no good saying that all your reverts are reverted, when a simple check on the history of the articles concerned shows that this isn't true. In essence, speak the truth or realise that people will come to expect inaccuracy of you; I've got too much to do to bother with such William M. Connolley (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2008 (UTC)