Misplaced Pages

:Featured article review/Kingdom of Mysore/archive1 - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured article review

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RegentsPark (talk | contribs) at 02:34, 5 December 2008 (Kingdom of Mysore: notifications request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:34, 5 December 2008 by RegentsPark (talk | contribs) (Kingdom of Mysore: notifications request)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Kingdom of Mysore

This article was promoted on November 4, 2007. I am aware that a lot of hard work went into the article, however, I feel that the article has some issues of inaccuracy and bias. I'm not implying, even remotely, that the bias was intended, but it nonetheless needs to be remedied. In particular, I feel the article violates three feature article criteria. These criteria are:

  • 1(b) comprehensive: it neglects no major facts or details and places the subject in context;
  • 1(c) factually accurate: claims are verifiable against reliable sources, accurately represent the relevant body of published knowledge, and are supported with specific evidence and external citations.
  • 1(d) neutral: it presents views fairly and without bias;

I have described the specifics in my post, My concerns on the article talk page. If you have more time to devote to this, you may also want to read the background section, however, in order to avoid repetition, please ignore the links to the sources there. Needless to say, this is very much my version of events and reality. Regards, Fowler&fowler«Talk» 02:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)