This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Reyk (talk | contribs) at 23:49, 22 December 2008 (→Tim Bowles: - heading go inside box). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 23:49, 22 December 2008 by Reyk (talk | contribs) (→Tim Bowles: - heading go inside box)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy close as keep. Querrelous and pointy nomination. Phil Sandifer (talk) 19:08, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:Tim Bowles
- Tim Bowles (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Same as with Michelle Stith, no reliable third-party sources really discuss the subject himself, only his activities on behalf of an organization. The sources are all about Scientology and related litigation, not Tim Bowles as a person. *** Crotalus *** 16:36, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, querulous re-re-re-renomination - David Gerard (talk) 18:14, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, after one or two AfDs, I can understand the merit for re-nomination. But a fifth nomination? The consensus is clearly to keep. ←Spidern→ 18:53, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. Not only is this the 5th nomination of the article, the article also blatantly tells the guy is notable: "He is the executive director of Youth for Human Rights International, and is a Commissioner on the Board of Advisors of the Citizens Commission on Human Rights, both Church of Scientology sponsored organizations." That's verifiable. -Mgm| 19:00, 22 December 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.