Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/Edcolins - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Freestylefrappe (talk | contribs) at 22:23, 21 October 2005 (→[]: support vote). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 22:23, 21 October 2005 by Freestylefrappe (talk | contribs) (→[]: support vote)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Edcolins

Requests_for_adminship/Edcolins|action=edit}} Vote here (6/0/1) ending 12:00 October 28, 2005 (UTC)

Edcolins (talk · contribs) – Edcolins has been a member of the Misplaced Pages community since March of 2004. During that time he has amassed more than 11,000 edits on a very consistent basis (20 edits per day, consistent average since May 2004). He has made significant contributions in law and related topics, Misplaced Pages:Requested articles, Misplaced Pages:Cleanup and a large number of other areas. He has been active in Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion, disambiguation work, and vandal fighting. In his contributions and user interactions he has been level headed, patient, and professional. He uses edit summaries 80% of the time. I have very (insanely?) high standards for nominating a candidate, and Edcolins meets my requirements. --Durin 19:18, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I accept the nomination. Thanks, Durin. --Edcolins 12:03, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Support

  1. Support per above. --Durin 19:19, 20 October 2005 (UTC)
  2. Support Looks to be an outstanding contributor--MONGO 12:11, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
  3. Support I'm deeply surprised this person isn't an admin already. Private Butcher 15:34, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
  4. Support per nom.  BDAbramson 16:21, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
  5. Support Dlyons493 Talk 17:04, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
  6. Support Oran e (t) (c) (@) 20:44, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
  7. Support low edit-summary use is really not a factor in this case, since he clearly has the experience. freestylefrappe 22:23, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. --Boothy443 | comhrá 21:05, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. Definately support on condition of email being supplied. Martin 15:41, 21 October 2005 (UTC)
No problem. I have checked the "Enable email from other users" box in my "Preferences". --Edcolins 15:50, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Comments

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A. Blocking vandals if necessary. Deleting an article for which there is a consensus. Any of the admin tasks whenever necessary.
I don't plan any major change in the way I contribute. I am just dedicated to help the community concentrate in writing excellent articles, by reaching consensus on NPOV matter, adding references, creating disambiguation pages, redirect, merging articles, and so on.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A. I'll give five examples. "European Patent Convention" is a precise article, with a good perspective I think. "Inventive step and non-obviousness" is a fruitful "transatlantic" collaboration. "Claim" is technically rich. "Software patents under the EPC" has a solid structure. And "London Agreement" helps to understand this legal arrangement, I think (well I hope so!).
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A. See Talk:Alicante and Talk:Jerome H. Lemelson (I posted a RfC for this "threat").
I think I have progressively improved the way I deal with conflicts. I basically try to prevent them, by being as NPOV as possible and discussing the matter on talk pages as early as possible (as in Is the source reliable?). I have met a lot of reasonable wikipedians actually.