This is an old revision of this page, as edited by KleenupKrew (talk | contribs) at 06:01, 19 January 2009 (→OSHO Dynamic Meditation: redirect). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:01, 19 January 2009 by KleenupKrew (talk | contribs) (→OSHO Dynamic Meditation: redirect)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)OSHO Dynamic Meditation
- OSHO Dynamic Meditation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Osho Dynamic Meditation, a claimed trademark of Osho Foundation International is a non-notable product name used for a meditation technique.
The exact name is used in 7 published books under the authorship of Osho himself. Google books returns another 7 books by independent authors (although one of them is listed as a contact on an Osho meditation center).
There are 2 results on google scholar, and 0 results on google news.
The page currently contains one inline citation. ←Spidern→ 05:11, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spirituality-related deletion discussions. -- ←Spidern→ 05:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. -- ←Spidern→ 05:20, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Keep Our article on it is very poor, but there are nearly a couple of hundred matches in google books: Even discounting the primary sources, there's still a few dozen solid scholarly sources left. A few dozen matches in google scholar: Google generally: about 20,000 matches. Jayen466 05:39, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- As for the trademark, they seem to have lost it, according to this press report just a couple of days ago: Jayen466 05:48, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
- Redirect to Osho (aka, Bhagwan Sree Rajneesh). Nothing about this product/brand name for meditation establishes any notability apart from the Rajneesh movement, so any mention of it belongs there and not in a separate article. KleenupKrew (talk) 06:01, 19 January 2009 (UTC)