This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rlevse (talk | contribs) at 02:10, 3 February 2009 (→Sade desysopped: diff of log on meta). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 02:10, 3 February 2009 by Rlevse (talk | contribs) (→Sade desysopped: diff of log on meta)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
ArbitrationCommittee
| Misplaced Pages Arbitration |
|---|
 |
| Open proceedings |
| Active sanctions |
| Arbitration Committee |
Audit
|
| Track related changes |
This noticeboard is for announcements and statements made by the Arbitration Committee. Only members of the Arbitration Committee or the Committee's Clerks may post on this page, but all editors are encouraged to comment on the talk page.
Announcement archives:- 0 (2008-12 – 2009-01)
- 1 (to 2009-02)
- 2 (to 2009-05)
- 3 (to 2009-06)
- 4 (to 2009-07)
- 5 (to 2009-12)
- 6 (to 2010-12)
- 7 (to 2011-12)
- 8 (to 2012-12)
- 9 (to 2013-12)
- 10 (to 2015-12)
- 11 (to 2018-04)
- 12 (to 2020-08)
- 13 (to 2023-03)
- 14 (to present)
New noticeboard open
As part of our overall reform agenda, the Committee has decided to establish a new central noticeboard (this page), which will serve as a forum for arbitration-related announcements, notices, and other discussion.
A resolution authorizing this was passed 9/0, with votes in favor by Carcharoth, Casliber, FT2, John Vandenberg, Kirill Lokshin, Rlevse, Sam Blacketer, Stephen Bain, and Vassyana, and no votes against or abstentions.
For the Committee, Kirill 12:06, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
FT2 steps down from ArbCom
FT2 has announced on User talk:Jimbo Wales that he is stepping down as an arbitrator. The Arbitration Committee believes that FT2's decision to leave the committee was the sensible course of action under all the circumstances, and we appreciate his having done so.
Over the past several weeks, and particularly since the new group of arbitrators arrived in late December, the committee has internally discussed various aspects of this matter. Although no arbitration case was pending against FT2, an increasing number of arbitrators had concluded that – in light of the volume of community concerns expressed – FT2's continued participation as an arbitrator had become untenable, and FT2 was advised of this. This does not represent a finding of wrongdoing.
FT2 made valuable contributions during his time on the committee. He is a long-term dedicated Wikipedian and we anticipate that he will remain one, working on other areas of the project. Now that FT2 has left the committee, the Arbitration Clerks have removed him from the list of arbitrators and will recalculate the majorities on pending cases and motions accordingly. Whether to fill the vacant committee seat at this time is a decision for Jimbo Wales.
For the Committee, --ROGER DAVIES 21:42, 15 January 2009 (UTC)
New mailing list structure
The Committee has decided to implement several changes to its existing mailing list structure:
- The Committee's main mailing list, arbcom-l, will be restricted to sitting arbitrators, the designated mailing list coordinator, and Jimbo Wales.
- The Committee's private wiki will be identically restricted.
- The current "sitting arbitrators only" list will be retained as a backup to arbcom-l, but will not be normally used.
- A new mailing list, functionaries-l, will be created, with membership open to all arbitrators, former arbitrators in good standing, and CheckUser and Oversight operators.
The resolution authorizing this was passed 13/0, with votes in favor by Carcharoth, Casliber, Cool Hand Luke, Coren, FayssalF, FloNight, John Vandenberg, Kirill Lokshin, Newyorkbrad, Rlevse, Roger Davies, Vassyana, and Wizardman, and no votes against or abstentions.
For the Committee, Kirill 23:04, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Proposal: CheckUser and OverSight permissions
A proposal concerning the appointment of additional editors with CheckUser and Oversight permissions was posted by the committee for discussion on 8 January 2009 and will remain open until 29 January 2009.
For the Committee, --ROGER DAVIES 15:02, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement RfC
The Arbitration Committee has opened a Request for Comment regarding arbitration enforcement, including a review of general and discretionary sanctions. All editors are encouraged to comment and contribute. The Committee will close the RfC one month from its opening. After the closing, the Committee intends to formalize reform proposals within one month.
For the Committee,
Vassyana (talk) 23:56, 20 January 2009 (UTC)
Committee agenda as of January 20
Listed below are the items which currently comprise the agenda of the Arbitration Committee.
Two points that should be kept in mind:
- Several of the measures being considered may require some form of community ratification prior to being fully adopted. The target date for this is not explicitly listed, but can be assumed to occur after the final date for internal Committee deliberations.
- The target dates are not set in stone; while we will make our best effort to meet them, there are any number of unforeseen circumstances which may cause them to change, and they are subject to revision as other issues arise.
The agenda is as follows:
- Decide on updates to arbitration enforcement procedures
- Initiate AE RfC by January 21
- Compile RFC results by February 21
- Draft reform proposals by March 7
- Finalize reform proposals by March 21
- Determine procedure for publishing proposals
- Decision by January 31
- Appoint CU & OS operators
- Finalize election setup by January 31
- Finalize appointments by February 28
- Determine case acceptance criteria
- Decision by January 31
- Determine procedure for emergency rights removal
- Draft proposal by January 31
- Decision by February 14
- Decide on designating an IRC liaison
- Compile chanop comments by January 31
- Decision by February 14
- Decide on appointing CU & OS auditors
- Finalize proposal by February 7
- Finalize appointments by February 28
- Determine recusal standards
- Draft proposal by February 7
- Decision by February 21
- Determine workshop page structure
- Decision by February 14
- Determine how to deal with users leaving during cases
- Draft proposal by February 14
- Decision by February 28
- Decide on acceptance of private evidence
- Draft proposal by February 14
- Decision by February 28
- Prepare updated guide to arbitration
- Draft by February 21
- Finalized by March 7
- Determine how to deal with users returning from bans
- Draft proposal by February 21
- Decision by March 7
- Decide on locations of arbitration pages
- Draft structure by February 21
- Decision by March 7
- Implementation by March 14
- Move forward on handling civility
- Detailed agenda by February 28
- Determine procedure for handling banned user appeals
- Draft proposal by February 28
- Decision by March 14
- Determine approach to considering off-wiki actions
- Draft proposal by February 28
- Decision by March 14
- Determine standards of conduct in requests for arbitration
- Draft proposal by March 7
- Decision by March 21
- Develop an arbitrator recall process
- Draft proposal by March 7
- Final proposal by March 21
- Prepare updated Arbitration Policy
- Draft by March 7
- Finalized by March 21
- Move forward on content dispute resolution
- Detailed agenda by March 14
- Decide on using summary motions in rejected cases
- Draft proposal due March 14
- Decision due March 21
- Prepare updated transition document
- Draft by October 31
- Finalized by November 30
- Prepare updated induction document
- Draft by October 31
- Finalized by November 30
For the Committee, Kirill 01:52, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Motion Re : Bishzilla
The request for arbitration named above has been declined as superseded by motion :
- Bishzilla (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is strongly admonished for her conduct in this matter. She is advised not to block users to force further discussion or action on an issue, nor to increase the pace of an issue, and not to take administrator actions with respect to disputes in which she is involved. Bishzilla is warned that any further such incidents are likely to lead to the suspension or revocation of her administrator privileges.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Mailer Diablo 14:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Clarification by motion relating to arbitration enforcement restriction
The Arbitration Committee has amended the restriction on arbitration enforcement activity in Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Motion: re SlimVirgin by successful motion, archived here, to include two clarifications of the initial remedy.
Effective immediately, the restriction applies only to specific administrative actions applied to specific users. It does not apply to notices, editor lists, warnings, broad topic area actions, or other "enforcement actions" that are not specific actions applied to specific editors. This is a provisional measure, pending the resolution of the arbitration enforcement request for comment. Furthermore, the Committee observed that administrators are normally expected to explain their actions, respond to feedback, and otherwise engage in normal discussion and dispute resolution, and that the restriction on arbitration enforcement activity provides no exception to this standard.
For the Arbitration Committee
Daniel (talk) 02:30, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/PHG
The above-linked Arbitration case has been closed and the final decision published.
PHG's mentorship and sourcing arrangement is both revised and extended; the full list of new conditions are available by clicking this link. Furthermore, the original topic ban on editing articles related to medieval or ancient history has been rescinded. PHG is prohibited from editing articles relating to the Mongol Empire, the Crusades, intersections between Crusader states and the Mongol Empire, and Hellenistic India—all broadly defined. This topic ban will last for a period of one year. He is permitted to make suggestions on talk pages, provided that he interacts with other editors in a civil fashion.
Any particular article may be added or removed from PHG's editing restriction at the discretion of his mentor; publicly logged to prevent confusion of the restriction's coverage. The mentor is encouraged to be responsive to feedback from editors in making and reconsidering such actions. Furthermore, the Committee noted that PHG has complied with the Committee's restrictions over the past ten months, and that PHG is encouraged to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages and Wikimedia projects. PHG should be permitted and encouraged by other editors to write well-sourced suggestions on talkpages, to contribute free-content images to Wikimedia Commons, and to build trust with the community.
For the Arbitration Committee,
Daniel (talk) 22:28, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
CU and OS elections
The proposal at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight appointments has passed and been made a policy at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight elections. Consequently the first English Misplaced Pages CU and OS elections will begin this Friday. For details see: Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/CheckUser and Oversight elections/February 2009 For the arbitration committee, — Rlevse • Talk • 00:43, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Sade desysopped
Sade (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) is desysopped for involvement in abusive sockpuppetry and for failing to respond to enquiries from ArbCom.
Arbitrators supporting: Carcharoth, Casliber, Coren, Cool Hand Luke, FloNight, Kirill Lokshin, Rlevse, Roger Davies, Vassyana, Wizardman.
Arbitrators opposing: FayssalF, John Vandenburg, Sam Blacketer, Stephen Bain.
Arbitrators abstaining: none.
Arbitrators not voting: Newyorkbrad, Risker.
— Rlevse • Talk • 01:04, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Categories: