This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Orangemike (talk | contribs) at 13:40, 18 March 2009 (→Well: As long as you're keeping to that voluntary politics topic ban, I welcome your return to editing). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:40, 18 March 2009 by Orangemike (talk | contribs) (→Well: As long as you're keeping to that voluntary politics topic ban, I welcome your return to editing)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Home | Talk | About me | Awards | Subpages | Contributions | My ? Page | Voting Record | My Scripts | Useful Links |
The date is: December 29, 2024
Please put your signature on additions to this page.
Well
I actually meant to re-instate the 1 month block, but it looks like I botched that. How newbish of me... Anyhow, you seem to have come around and if you are willing to accept a voluntary politics topic ban I think people might be OK with you returning to editing. –xeno (talk) 12:28, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
- I certainly would have no problem with that. A diversity of opinions is always a healthy condition here! --Orange Mike | Talk 13:40, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
Tagging for speedy deletion
Hi Axmann8. Thank you for your work on patrolling pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I just wanted to inform you that I declined to delete Gigant Neo, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion under criterion A7 because of the following concern: A7 does not cover animals. Also, the article has multiple claims of notability. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion and especially what is considered Non-criteria. In future you should rather tag such pages for proposed deletion or start an appropriate deletion discussion. Regards SoWhy 12:49, 18 March 2009 (UTC)