Technocracy Study Course - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Skipsievert (talk | contribs) at 17:56, 20 March 2009 (→External links: Library archive). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 17:56, 20 March 2009 by Skipsievert (talk | contribs) (→External links: Library archive)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

The Technocracy Study Course is a book published by Technocracy Incorporated in 1934 that formed the basis of the Technocracy movement. The Technical Alliance was formed in conjunction with the Industrial Engineering Department at Columbia University, and began an empirical analysis of production and employment in North America in energy units. This information was then published as the Technocracy Study Course.

M. King Hubbert a geo-scientist was also an avid Technocrat. He co-founded Technocracy Incorporated with Howard Scott and contributed significantly to the Technocracy Study Course, the precedent document of that group which advocates a Non-market economics form of Energy accounting,as opposed to the current Price System method. Hubbert was a member of the Board of Governors, and served as Secretary of education to that organisation

History

Willard Gibbs developed a 'Theory of Energy Determinants' also referred to as vector analysis which according to Howard Scott, formed the basis of determining the operational dynamic of functional social design on a continental scale of magnitude for North America. Gibbs thermodynamic approach led to the concepts of Energy accounting as conceived by the Technical Alliance. Scott referred to Gibbs as the person that made possible the concept of energy economics using Energy accounting in a technate design.

Technical Alliance project

The Technical Alliance measured and assessed the extent of the land's natural resources of soil, metals, fuels, hydrology and its energy resources, its transport and communications and construction capabilities, its industrial and technological productive capacity, its available scientific, engineering, biological trained personnel--all to determine whether the area of North America could provide an equitably individualized high optimum standard of living for its population, and if so, how this could be brought about in the form of a governing body which they later referred to as a technate.