Misplaced Pages

User talk:Black Kite

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 13:04, 3 May 2009 (Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 48h) to User talk:Black Kite/Archive 22.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 13:04, 3 May 2009 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 48h) to User talk:Black Kite/Archive 22.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

User:Black Kite/Navigation

If you are here to query the removal of non-free images in articles, please click here before posting. Thank you.
File:BK01.jpg
Talk Page archives: 01-02-03-04-05-06-07-08-09-10-11-12-13-14-15-16-17-18-19-20-21-22

Help?

Hi Black Kite,

We have interacted before on other issues, and I could use an admin hand or advice, preferably before Google decides to update their index...

I posted this at WP:ANI and I got a rather odd reply/argument from User:Ironholds, which I discussed with him here. I don't agree with his conclusion and would greatly appreciate a second set of eyes, if you have the time.

Cheers and many thanks, pedrito - talk - 30.03.2009 12:53

Has been taken care of by another admin, albeit in a somewhat lenient way... Thanks anyway! pedrito - talk - 31.03.2009 06:11
Actually, I'd still be interested in a second opinion, if you have the time... Cheers and many thanks, pedrito - talk - 31.03.2009 08:30

Article undeleted - sorry for templating you

iTunes Originals

Baronets

Hiya

I replied on my talk page to your question about baronets, but then I archived the whole page. The reply is at User_talk:BrownHairedGirl/Archive/Archive_016#Baronet_names.

The reason I archived everything is that I think I have had enough. I have been working through thousands of articles on British Members of Parliament, many of whom are baronets, disambiguating a pile of highly ambiguous names, and now find that it is apparently quite acceptable for Vintagekits to just wade in with a pile of threats and a barrage of abuse and move everything around without checking, while denouncing those who try to undo the mess as "disruptive" and a "disgrace".

I have not yet decided whether I am going to leave wikipedia, but I am considering it. I come here to put my energies into building an encyclopedia, and if the price of that is being dragged yet again into a sordid row with someone whose only interest in the subjects I work on is his hatred of them, then it's simply not fun. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)