This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 9Nak (talk | contribs) at 18:18, 3 May 2009 (Warriors redirect). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:18, 3 May 2009 by 9Nak (talk | contribs) (Warriors redirect)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Help?
Hi Black Kite,
We have interacted before on other issues, and I could use an admin hand or advice, preferably before Google decides to update their index...
I posted this at WP:ANI and I got a rather odd reply/argument from User:Ironholds, which I discussed with him here. I don't agree with his conclusion and would greatly appreciate a second set of eyes, if you have the time.
Cheers and many thanks, pedrito - talk - 30.03.2009 12:53
- Has been taken care of by another admin, albeit in a somewhat lenient way... Thanks anyway! pedrito - talk - 31.03.2009 06:11
- Actually, I'd still be interested in a second opinion, if you have the time... Cheers and many thanks, pedrito - talk - 31.03.2009 08:30
Article undeleted - sorry for templating you
iTunes Originals
Baronets
Hiya
I replied on my talk page to your question about baronets, but then I archived the whole page. The reply is at User_talk:BrownHairedGirl/Archive/Archive_016#Baronet_names.
The reason I archived everything is that I think I have had enough. I have been working through thousands of articles on British Members of Parliament, many of whom are baronets, disambiguating a pile of highly ambiguous names, and now find that it is apparently quite acceptable for Vintagekits to just wade in with a pile of threats and a barrage of abuse and move everything around without checking, while denouncing those who try to undo the mess as "disruptive" and a "disgrace".
I have not yet decided whether I am going to leave wikipedia, but I am considering it. I come here to put my energies into building an encyclopedia, and if the price of that is being dragged yet again into a sordid row with someone whose only interest in the subjects I work on is his hatred of them, then it's simply not fun. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 01:48, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
The Warriors (2010 film)
I've redirected the new entry to the relevant section on the old entry. It seems to make sense as a redirect (barely) because it may become a popular search term if the project goes ahead. But I'm not disputing the PROD; I agree it should not be a standalone article and I'd have PRODed it myself had I been familiar with WP:NFF. So if the redirect is disputed I'll be happy to PROD it again or take it to AfD. 9Nak (talk) 18:18, 3 May 2009 (UTC)