Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by SPCUClerkbot (talk | contribs) at 22:39, 19 May 2009 (BOT updates, actions follow: (listing accounts notified)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Caden

Caden (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Caden/Archive.

Report date May 19 2009, 22:39 (UTC)

Suspected sockpuppets

• Corpiestre (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

This user shows up out of nowhere and starts defending the suspected sock master, who was previously blocked today, for a day.— Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Evidence submitted by Daedalus969

Comments by accused parties    See Defending yourself against claims.

Comments by other users

CheckUser requests

{{RFCU}} is deprecated. Please change the case status parameter in {{SPI case status}} to "CURequest" instead.

Checkuser request – code letter: E (Community ban/sanction evasion )

Current status – Awaiting initial clerk review.    Requested by — Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

CU is required as the block, or extention thereof, rests on these CU findings, in that, his block may remain the same, assuming this is just some random vandal that appears to have taken interest in him(I don't think this is likely, too many things don't add up), but to the point, if this suspected sock, is found to be a sock, further action needs to be taken in regards to the master account.— Dædαlus 22:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Clerk, patrolling admin and checkuser comments

Conclusions

• Open SPI cases
• SPI requests for pre-CheckUser review