This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 16:30, 6 June 2009 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Tom harrison/Archive 2009.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 16:30, 6 June 2009 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Tom harrison/Archive 2009.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
For new users
If you are new here, welcome. The page Misplaced Pages:Welcome, newcomers has links to a tutorial, and answers to frequently-asked questions.
Archives
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 14 days are automatically archived to User talk:Tom harrison/Archive 2007 . Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Misplaced Pages:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Pentagon
Hi. Well, it wasn't me who's undone one's version WITHOUT any explaination or argumentation. Next time you or any of your overzealous collegues undo my version, please write some argumentation at least, but most of all, please familiarize with the evidence depicted in the videos I've linked. Cheers.
George Shultz
Did something offend about the article, or was it just one of those misclick things? Ray 00:30, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- No, I removed some material added by a banned user. Sorry for any inconvenience, Tom Harrison 12:20, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Condoleezza Rice
Any reason why you've taken the Hoover institute reference out? VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 02:39, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- As above, just because it was added by a banned user. No opinion on the content. Sorry for any inconvenience. Tom Harrison 12:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Okey Dokey. Thanks for responding so promptly. I've changed it back. By the way, are you sure that Thaiverb is a banned user? There's nothing to that effect on the user talkpage, and the edits s/he's done seem harmless to me.VsevolodKrolikov (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Re your recent reversion on Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
Hi Tom, Please discuss why you believe the edits were in the wrong, consider World_Trade_Center_controlled_demolition_conspiracy_theories is a more precise rendition of what they seem to support. Also consider what the source of 'outside their experience' actually relates to. I trust that you will self revert. Unomi (talk) 12:35, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- If I have anything to say I'll use the article talk page. I encourage you to do the same. Tom Harrison 12:37, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Arbitration Request
Please see Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Tom_harrison. Thanks, Unomi (talk) 01:08, 6 June 2009 (UTC)