Misplaced Pages

User talk:2012Olympian

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 12:36, 11 August 2009 (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to User talk:2008Olympian/Archives/2009/June.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:36, 11 August 2009 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 2 thread(s) (older than 30d) to User talk:2008Olympian/Archives/2009/June.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Status: Online

Drop some knowledge on me! Archive

Archives

  1. August 2008
  2. September 2008
  3. October 2008

Definition of AA

I would be interested in your opinion on this discussion: Talk:Alcoholics Anonymous#Recovery vs. recovered

TUF 10 & TreyGeek Talkback

Hello, 2012Olympian. You have new messages at TreyGeek's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Request for mediation not accepted

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party was not accepted and has been delisted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/Use of Sports Logos.
For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 02:20, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

WT:MMA

Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Mixed_martial_arts#Quinton_Jackson.23Feud_with_Mo_Lawal, input appreciated. --aktsu  13:46, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

Request for arbitration: Date delinking amendment motion

A request to amend the dates delinking arbitration case (filed 19 July 2009) has resulted in a motion (filed 2 August 2009) that proposes to change the restrictions imposed on you as a result of the case. The proposed amendment would affect the restrictions pertaining to 16 editors, all of whom are now being notified of the proposed amendment. Given that the proposed amendment affects your restrictions, and further that the proposed amendment will restrict the filing of further proposed amendments for a period of 30 days, your input is invited at the amendments page. You may view an unofficial table of the proposed changes here. Comments from affected parties are currently being considered by the Arbitration Committee. If you would like the arbitrators who have already voted to reconsider their votes in light of your comments, please indicate that in your comments.

For the Arbitration Committee

Seddσn | 03:17, 11 August 2009 (UTC)