This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Risker (talk | contribs) at 22:32, 20 August 2009 (→Motions: add Locke Cole motion). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

• recent changes
• purge this page
• view or discuss this template

Currently, there are no requests for arbitration.

No cases have recently been closed (view all closed cases).

Currently, no requests for clarification or amendment are open.

Motions

Shortcuts WP:ARM WP:ARBM This page can be used by arbitrators to propose motions not related to any existing case or request. Motions are archived at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Index/Motions. Only arbitrators may propose or vote on motions on this page. You may visit WP:ARC or WP:ARCA for potential alternatives. Make a motion (Arbitrators only) You can make comments in the sections called "community discussion" or in some cases only in your own section. Arbitrators or clerks may summarily remove or refactor any comment.

• WP:A/R/M

Motion re Locke Cole

Reference arbitration case: Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration/Date delinking

Previous amendments: August 2, 2009 Motion enacted August 17, 2009.

Preamble

Locke Cole (talk · contribs) has contacted the Arbitration Committee by email, requesting that his current editing ban be lifted or amended. There were also references to his ban during the discussion of the motion enacted August 17, 2009. On review of the case, and the recent related amendments to it, the following motion is offered for consideration.

Motion

The remedy banning Locke Cole (talk · contribs) from editing Misplaced Pages for six months is amended as follows:

• Locke Cole is provisionally unbanned effective at the enactment of this motion.
• Should Locke Cole be blocked as a result of violating the three-revert rule, his full editing ban will be reinstated for the remainder of its original duration, until December 14, 2009.
• Locke Cole remains indefinitely topic-banned from style and editing guidelines relating to the linking or unlinking of dates, and any related discussions.
• Locke Cole remains subject to an editing restriction for 12 months (until June 14, 2010), under which he is prohibited from reverting the linking or unlinking of dates.
• Locke Cole is reminded to abide by all applicable policies and guidelines in his editing, so that further controversies such as the one that led to the arbitration case will not arise, and any disagreements concerning style guidelines can be addressed in a civil and efficient fashion.

Support

1. This amendment is consistent with the other amendments made in this case in recent weeks, and alters only the length of Locke Cole's ban. Risker (talk) 22:32, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Oppose

Abstain

Recuse

Discussion by Arbitrators

Discussion by others