Misplaced Pages

Talk:Prithu

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Redtigerxyz (talk | contribs) at 07:17, 11 April 2010 ({{WikiProject Mythology|class = GA}}). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 07:17, 11 April 2010 by Redtigerxyz (talk | contribs) ({{WikiProject Mythology|class = GA}})(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Good articlePrithu has been listed as one of the Philosophy and religion good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 11, 2008Good article nomineeListed
Did You KnowA fact from this article appeared on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 29, 2008.
WikiProject iconHinduism GA‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconIndia GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Misplaced Pages's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconMythology GA‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is supported by WikiProject Mythology. This project provides a central approach to Mythology-related subjects on Misplaced Pages. Please participate by editing the article, and help us assess and improve articles to good and 1.0 standards, or visit the WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

censecretated?

In the first paragraph, should the phrase "first censecretated king" actually be "first consecrated king"? Nortonew (talk) 15:20, 29 July 2008 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Prithu/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    The first sentence of the lead needs to be rewritten; it is too complex and should probably be rewritten into two sentences. The problem lays in that the listing of alternative names breaks up the sentence so the flow is lost. Also, in the main text the sentence "However, The Manu Smriti calls the earth (Prithvi) as Prithu's wife, instead of his daughter, thus was the name Prithvi from her husband's name." doesn't make sense to me. Could you please rewrite it. Otherwise I have done some minor copyediting.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
    Remeber to use {{cite book}} whenever citing a book. There were three instances that didn't comply, but I have fixed them up.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Two sentences to fix up and the article will pass. If you have any questions or comments, do not hesitate to state them here. Arsenikk 12:21, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
    Since the concerns have been addressed, I hereby declare this article Good. Congratulations!Arsenikk 13:35, 11 October 2008 (UTC)
Categories: