This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Talkingbirds (talk | contribs) at 21:13, 14 September 2009 (→The Shells). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 21:13, 14 September 2009 by Talkingbirds (talk | contribs) (→The Shells)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)The Shells
- The Shells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I see no indication that they meet the requirements in WP:BAND. They've been nominated for one little award (so little that the article about that award wasn't even created until less than two weeks ago) so this certainly doesn't count as a "major music award" or "major music competition" as described in the requirement linked above. As for substantial coverage in independent sources, all I see is three sentences in Seventeen and someone's blog. No album released yet, no charting singles, no nothing. And for a band that's supposed to be the WP:up and coming next big thing (which is not an appropriate reason for an article anyway), not that many people are looking them up on Misplaced Pages (pageview stats). rʨanaɢ /contribs 00:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC) rʨanaɢ /contribs 11:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete, no charting albums (actually, that unreleased album should be up for AFD too), non-notable label (which was recently speedied), nominated for a minor award that they might not even win (
we'll see tonight). No prejudice against recreation if they do explode onto the charts overnight...or something like that. As of now, they fail WP:BAND for the reasons described above. talkingbirds 16:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)- You're right about the album, I forgot to mention that in the nom statement. To the closing admin: if this article is deleted, Written Roads should be deleted along with it. rʨanaɢ /contribs 19:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Striking comment They lost the award, so I'm definitely going delete. If they would have won this minor award, I would have been a little more lenient on the deletedeletedelete argument. But simply being nominated for a small award that will probably not be introduced again next year & was not presented on-air is not enough justification to pass WP:BAND. talkingbirds 21:13, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Delete for now. Maybe next month, we'll have more to talk about. THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 21:19, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
- Keep. All part of the rich tapestry. HWV258 07:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- Do you intend to address any of the policy issues raised above, or do you just like the article? rʨanaɢ /contribs 17:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
- "All part of the rich tapestry"? What? THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 18:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)