Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 12:45, 26 September 2009 (Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 14d) to User talk:Akhilleus/Archive 16.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Archives

one two (Mar 21 2006-July 11 2006) three (July 20 2006-Sept 24 2006) four (Sept 30 2006-Oct 31 2006) five six seven (May 2007) eight (June 2007) nine (July 2007) ten (Aug 2007) eleven (Sept 2007) twelve (Oct 2007) thirteen (Nov 2007) fourteen (Dec 2007-Feb 2008) fifteen (Mar 2008)

This page has archives. Sections older than 14 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Q&A

Am I supposed to post my reply here or on my own Talk Page? Anyway, my reply is currently on my Talk Page. tcob44

Ponte Vecchio

Please see Talk:Ponte_Vecchio#Undoing_the_compromise? ... it has been suggested that the article be returned to a more standard format, as it has been a year since the compromise. Your participation may be helpful. ++Lar: t/c 12:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Triple Goddess

Thanks for the 3RR reminder. Also thanks for keeping a sane head and occasionally explaining my points better than I would myself! Davémon (talk) 16:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Doubting Thomas Akhilleus

Official recognition that Ottava Rima's behavior has been problematic. Jehochman 13:10, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

That worked well! --Akhilleus (talk) 15:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom

You are involved in a recently-filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#RS and Fringe Noticeboard and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

• Misplaced Pages:Requests for arbitration#Requesting Arbitration;
• Misplaced Pages:Arbitration guide.

Thanks,