Misplaced Pages

User talk:Domer48

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by One Night In Hackney (talk | contribs) at 12:22, 10 November 2009 (→Page ban at Peter Hart: Oh no he isn't!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 12:22, 10 November 2009 by One Night In Hackney (talk | contribs) (→Page ban at Peter Hart: Oh no he isn't!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
If you object to anything you read on this page, then the correct solution is to click here. Domer48 (talk) 16:30, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Pádraig, Rest In Peace a chara - sorely missed - not to be forgotten.


-- Trolls will be removed with Extreme prejudice!

This editor is a
Veteran Editor II
and is entitled to display this
Bronze Editor Star.
This editor is a Grand Tutnum and is entitled to display this Book of Knowledge with Coffee Cup Stain.
Today is 1 January 2025


Archive
Archives
  1. Archive 1 - February 2007 to December 2007
  2. Archive 2 - Jan 2008 to December 2008
  3. Archive 3 - Jan 2009 to December 2009
  4. Archive 4

Useful links


Irish Manual of Style~ Policy ~ Assume good faith ~ Citing sources ~ Civility ~ Consensus ~ Dispute resolution ~ Etiquette ~ No original research ~ What Misplaced Pages is not ~ No personal attacks ~ Neutral point of view ~ POINT ~ Reliable sources ~ Verifiability ~ WP:Attribution ~ WP:Synthesis ~ tools ~ WP:Avoid peacock terms ~ Misplaced Pages:Avoid weasel terms


Useful Noticeboard

3RR~ WP:Reliable sources/Noticeboard ~ Third opinion Noticeboard ~ Misplaced Pages:No original research/noticeboard


Template messages

Warning templates ~ Template messages/Sources of articles ~ Template messages/Cleanup ~ Template messages/Disputes


Diff

Page ban at Peter Hart

I did tell you that you would be banned from editing Peter Hart (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) if you restored the coat-rack criticism and questionable sources. You did so here. You are now banned from editing the Peter Hart article for the next three months. I have of course reverted your edit. Please do not add similar questionably sourced criticism of Hart to any other article. Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:03, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

I don't think so! No Troubles remedy gives you the authority to ban Domer from that page, I suggest you read them. There is an ArbCom case that would give you the authority to ban someone from a page, but as you haven't followed the correct procedure required by the remedy from that case that can't apply either. That said, and without having had time to investigate the merits of the edits in question, I would advise Domer in the strongest possible terms not to add the disputed material in question or any other possibly controversial material without clear consensus on the talk page. This should forestall the need for any petty and vindictive blocks, and unless Domer says he is going to restore the material and block that is attempted is not a preventative one and therefore against policy. I would caution anyone even thinking about using tools right now to investigate recent ArbCom cases involving page bans issued without authority and use of tools to enforce them. 2 lines of K303 12:22, 10 November 2009 (UTC)