Misplaced Pages

:Good article nominations - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Linas (talk | contribs) at 18:14, 24 December 2005 (→Self-nominations: me too!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 18:14, 24 December 2005 by Linas (talk | contribs) (→Self-nominations: me too!)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Misplaced Pages:Good articles is an unbureaucratic system to arrive at a quick consensus set of good articles: everyone can nominate good articles, and everyone has veto power. Self-nominations are frowned upon; that's what this list is for.

Instructions

For self-nominators

If you have contributed significantly to an article you believe to be good, list it below under "Self-nominations". You are done.

For all others

If you see an article below under "Self-nominations" that you haven't significantly contributed to and that you consider to be good, remove it from the list, add {{GA}} to its talk page, and list it on Misplaced Pages:Good articles.

If you see an article below under "Self-nominations" that you don't consider to be good, simply remove it from the list. It might be polite to give a reason in your edit summary.

Self-nominations