This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Nug (talk | contribs) at 20:23, 18 November 2009 (→Digwuren CU results). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 20:23, 18 November 2009 by Nug (talk | contribs) (→Digwuren CU results)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | Brandon is taking a short nap and will be back on Misplaced Pages next month. |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Digwuren CU results
Can you give us at least some information about Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Digwuren results? Why did you not make the results public but sent them to ArbCom? Offliner (talk) 10:20, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- The results may affect the outcome of an active ArbCom case and the committee has more information on the user than I do. Myself or another CU will post the results in a few days. Brandon (talk) 11:05, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Brandon, did you see the latest comments on the SPI page. --Martin (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I have. My findings are almost entirely unrelated to the evidence provided (which was largely stale and not actionable) nor are they very interesting. Brandon (talk) 19:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Okay. I see that User:Põhja Konn is listed as a suspected sock puppet. He was accused of this before by Offliner and he said he was willing to verify his real identity to a verified ArbCom member, so you may want to pass that on to ArbCom too. --Martin (talk) 20:23, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I have. My findings are almost entirely unrelated to the evidence provided (which was largely stale and not actionable) nor are they very interesting. Brandon (talk) 19:57, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
- Hi Brandon, did you see the latest comments on the SPI page. --Martin (talk) 18:29, 18 November 2009 (UTC)