Misplaced Pages

User talk:Fresheneesz

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 209.82.182.189 (talk) at 21:44, 1 February 2006 (→[]). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:44, 1 February 2006 by 209.82.182.189 (talk) (→[])(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

LAST WIPED (on the date next to my name) - Fresheneesz 07:57, 1 December 2005 (UTC)

Archive

View the archive of User_talk:Fresheneesz(archive)

Talk below

I remember you

I think I vaguely remember someone with your name at sciforums. -lethe 01:50, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

Euclid

I wasn't the one who made it a proper redirect, actually I deleted it because I thought it was a joke or something. I saw it on Recent Changes, and the person who fixed it must have seen it there too. Adam Bishop 06:40, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

KoL spoilers

There are so many problems with these tables:

  1. They're not complete
  2. When they're complete the page would be unmantainably large
  3. They look out of place in an otherwise good article
  4. There are other wikis for that information
  5. It's generally a silly idea.
  6. and so on...

Please read Misplaced Pages:What Misplaced Pages is not for more on that topic.  Grue  08:33, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Well, I don't think that a separate page is appropriate either, but I don't care about it enough to list it for deletion. You could've at least capitalised the words "Kingdom" and "Loathing" though...  Grue  21:59, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Image:Eqaulity relation.PNG

You listed this at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion but this is an image and should properly go to Misplaced Pages:Images for deletion. However, since you are the creator of the image, you can slap a {{db-author}} tag on it (speedy delete request by original author) and it will get deleted by an administrator. Regards, howcheng 22:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Hello, I would be very much interested in helping build a KoL table of information, there was once a website with an amazing table www.agesoftime.com/kol But it went down quite some time ago and i was very upset, well email me at James.reames@mail.mcintosh.k12.ga.us sometime and maybe we can work together on a table, or i can add to a table already in existance.(sorry for all incorrect spelling and grammar)

Brain scan images

Thanks for uploading images (Image:CTscan.PNG, Image:MRIscan.gif, Image:PETscan.png, Image:FMRIscan.jpg) for the brain imaging article. I am afraid they are not usable on Misplaced Pages, since their copyright is owned by another organization. (To use a copyrighted image without a permission violates both copyright laws and Misplaced Pages policies.) Most obviously, they are NOT postage stamps.

Unless you receive a permission from their respective copyright holders to use them under the terms of GFDL or a comparable license, or justify their inclusion as fair use, I am afraid they will be deleted.

Sincerely, Mike Rosoft 12:28, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

For now, I have marked the images with the correct tag: {{fairusein|Brain imaging}}. - Mike Rosoft 10:05, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

More images

I would also like to inform you that some of the images you have uploaded, namely Image:Opampvoltagefollower.png, Image:Opamp-differential.png, and Image:Opamp-noninverting.PNG have no licensing information. Presumedly, you want to license them under "Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike License" (just like Image:Opamp-noninverting.png), so please add {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to the image description pages. - Mike Rosoft 12:48, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

I have added the license tag to the image pages. If you disagree with this licensing, please correct them. - Mike Rosoft 10:05, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

E=mc2

I am a non-physicist scientist, and agree with the general direction of your posts on E=mc2 and mass, as well as some of those who put the problem more exactly.

I notice that there is a reference in the mass page (http://www.teleles.nl/pdf/total_artikel.pdf) which discusses Lev Okun's article "The Concept of Mass" in Physics Today, only gets it 100% wrong. This PDF article states that Lev defines m in the equation as rest mass; nothing could be more wrong. Rather he defines E as rest energy, asserts that there is only a single mass, etc. etc. Rather a good discussion really. I certainly think both pages need revision.