This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Neutralhomer (talk | contribs) at 15:34, 10 December 2009. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 15:34, 10 December 2009 by Neutralhomer (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) 5:13 am, 29 December 2024 (PDT)Welcome to my talk page! I will reply on your talk page unless you prefer otherwise as usually noted on your talk page. If you are an anonymous editor, I will reply here.
|
Archives | ||||||||
|
||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Idiot
Ok, I'll not do it again. --MisterWiki talk 15:53, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Can you protect my signature?, I think I will not change it again. I'm having troubles moving it to my preferences :(. --MisterWiki talk contribs 20:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, but it says Invalid raw signature. Check HTML tags. --MisterWiki talk contribs 20:41, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello, Daedalus969. You have new messages at MisterWiki's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
AN/I
Hi, regarding your recent AN/I, is that not something that should be sent straight to WP:OVERSIGHT rather than advertised on a public board? Regards, raseaC 23:35, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus 23:38, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think it could be considered serious. I'm not passing the buck, just figured I'd mention it to you rather than go to OS without consulting. raseaC 23:42, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
i dont understand
why is there talk about me? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Collinelder (talk • contribs) 23:37, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
- Replied on your talk page.— Dædαlus 23:46, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
I was expecting this...
...although I still think it's unfair to see another P&TF fansite listed, and accepted. I never liked Misplaced Pages for this, people make great efforts in their sites and they're never listed as references just because there's not a company behind it. Oh, well. I can understand because we just started this one, so it may still lack content, but... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.164.92.141 (talk) 10:16, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
- I was not aware there was another fansite, I shall delete it immediately.— Dædαlus 10:46, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Advertising?
And yet, Misplaced Pages IS advertising the IMDB, the NYT etc...No, big companies shouldn't have priority, sorry. But yes, the rules are the rules...Is there any way to complain over this? Any page on Misplaced Pages to fill out complaints? I'm sure we're not the only one in this case. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.164.92.141 (talk) 11:31, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:BlackKite'sPageErrors.JPG
A tag has been placed on File:BlackKite'sPageErrors.JPG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done under section I10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip that has no encyclopedic use.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. — Dædαlus 22:45, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 7 December 2009
- From the editors: 250th issue of the Signpost
- Editorial: A digital restoration
- Election report: ArbCom election in full swing
- Interview: Interview with David G. Post
- News and notes: Misplaced Pages's death report premature, fundraiser, usability, new CSD, noms, and more
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports and Miscellaneous Articulations
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Baffled
Why on earth did you make this report at AVI? At the time of the report, they'd only made one edit, had recieved one warning for it, and that's it. Is there something else, sock concerns etc, that you need to me to look into? GedUK 13:06, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
RE: Taking things personally
OK, this is the last I will say on this topic, cause it is boring the hell outta me and we both have better things to do than getting in a pissing match.
Please don't say something is "my article"...I don't WP:OWN articles, I just create them. Even if it is a small stub like WBQK or a "Start" article like WINC-FM, I take great pride in my work and enjoy what I do.
I wasn't discussing religion with you, it is a figure of speech. "Running all over God's creation" is the same as saying "Running all over town". No religious involvment, just a little southern twang added.
To be big point of your post...my rudeness. I do believe we both were being rude and snapping at each other. I don't think either of us were being particularly nice to one another and we were both being pretty territorial. I personally don't think bringing up two uninvolved blocks was necessary, whatever...but we were both being rude and snapping back. I think we both owe each other an apology. Let me start...I'm sorry. Should have said it last night, but normally I get stuck in my headstrong ways I won't back down from something. Normally it takes sleep to give fresh eyes.
I do believe you could have made three bad mistakes, but it still worries me. You are a good editor, whether you like me anymore or not, you are. It would worry me if any good editor started goofing up. What I should have done is asked if you needed someone to talk to, not crawl in your ass (another figure of speech, kinda like saying jumping down your throat) for something that was taking care of quite quickly.
I have been on a Wikibreak for the past couple months. It has served me well. A few editors emailed me and asked me to come back, at their asking, and a couple people on my talk page, I did. I am still in semi-retirement cause I am not ready to be fully back, maybe one day. So I have been on a personally mandated Wikibreak. It does give fresh eyes.
But whether you don't like me anymore, that is no sweat of my back. If ya do, ya do, if ya don't, ya don't...it doesn't bother me. Hell, if me and a good friend did that everytime we disagreed or got snippy, we wouldn't be Facebook buddies. But if you never like me again, it really doesn't bother me, just don't let it consume you. Another user and I used to HATE each other and now we have a working relationship, wouldn't call it a friendship, but we can talk without pouncing on each other immediately.
Hopefully this explains somethings...need something spoken upon a little better, I will make an attempt to, but in less words....these long posts are hard to type and even harder to read. - NeutralHomer • Talk • 15:34, 10 December 2009 (UTC)