This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) at 04:49, 2 January 2010 (→Notice of Complaint: Let Nothughthomas do as he wishes and wait for somebody else to look at the situation.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 04:49, 2 January 2010 by Tony Sidaway (talk | contribs) (→Notice of Complaint: Let Nothughthomas do as he wishes and wait for somebody else to look at the situation.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Old discussions now at /Archive 1 / /Archive 2 / /Archive 3 / /Archive 4 / /Archive 5 / /Archive 6 / /Archive 7 / /Archive 8 / /Archive 9 / /Archive 10 / /Archive 11 / /Archive 12 / /Archive 13 / /Archive 14 / /Archive 15 / /Archive 16 / /Archive 17 / /Archive 18 / /Archive 19 / /Archive 20 / /Archive 21 / /Archive 22 / /Archive 23 / /Archive 24 / /Archive 25 / /Archive 26 / /Archive 27 / /Archive 28
Please add new comments below.
TheSmokingGun.com
Greetings, You participated in a previous discussion about TheSmokingGun.com and whether it can be considered a reliable source. I don't feel that a clear consensus was reached and have reopened the discussion here, should you choose to participate. Regardless, have a Happy New Year!--otherlleft 20:51, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
NPOV
No problem... I completely agree that this should be discussed (you will note that I started a thread for just such a discussion), and I made the edit expecting that my edit would be reverted. I have found that it often takes both opening a discussion and making a bold edit to generate a propper discussion. Blueboar (talk) 21:38, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- My experience too. Welcome to the BRD club. :-) -- ChrisO (talk) 21:46, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
- the funny thing is that I have never said BRD was invalid... but I have said that discussion is needed first. Good for the goose and all that. :>) Blueboar (talk) 22:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Probation tagging
Thank you for adding the new climate change probation to the relevant talkpages. I seem to recall that there is a bot used for similar well-defined repetitive tasks by various WikiProjects - might not such a solution be easier? - 2/0 (cont.) 02:15, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Probably, but my knowledge of bots is about as extensive of my knowledge of the nightlife on Alpha Centauri... -- ChrisO (talk) 02:18, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks from me as well for your help, Awickert (talk) 03:07, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. I left a question for you on the AN climate change discussion page, by the way. -- ChrisO (talk) 03:09, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
Notice of Complaint
As required, this is the formal notice that I have filed complaint against you for violation of the Misplaced Pages censorship protocols that have been placed on the entries Dog and Christopher Monckton, 3rd Viscount Monckton of Brenchley. Nothughthomas (talk) 04:34, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
- Although I think you're probably right, Christ, don't mess with the complaint page any more. Let Nothughthomas do as he wishes and wait for somebody else to look at the situation. --TS 04:49, 2 January 2010 (UTC)