This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Alice Lyddel (talk | contribs) at 01:10, 10 January 2010 (→Climate change general sanctions). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.
Revision as of 01:10, 10 January 2010 by Alice Lyddel (talk | contribs) (→Climate change general sanctions)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Welcome!
Hello, Alice Lyddel, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Guettarda (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
Climate change general sanctions
I noticed that you edited the Climatic Research Unit hacking incident article, and I just wanted to make sure that you were aware that all articles related to climate change are under 'general sanctions'. Specifically, the Climatic Research Unit hacking incident article is under a one-revert-per-24-hour-period restriction, and the edit you made was a revert (and an issue that has been contentious). When you're only allowed a single revert per day, it's easy to step over the limit inadvertently, so I thought it useful to let you know. I also noticed that you had not yet been welcomed. Guettarda (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
- I don't understand. I didn't "revert" anything. I just noticed that the word I had used to get to that article (i.e. "Climategate") was not bolded like it should be, so I did. It's still bolded, in fact. Don't tell me you all are fighting over bolding a redirect? My my, that's terrible. Alice Lyddel (talk) 01:10, 10 January 2010 (UTC)