This is an old revision of this page, as edited by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) at 17:19, 9 January 2010 (Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 48h) to User talk:Wuhwuzdat/Archive 3.). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:19, 9 January 2010 by MiszaBot III (talk | contribs) (Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 48h) to User talk:Wuhwuzdat/Archive 3.)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)PAGE RULES:
- 1) A new topic requires a new section.
- 2) New sections go at the bottom of this page.
- 3) New sections require titles.
- 4) New replies go underneath the post they are in reply to.
- 5) Sign your posts by typing ~~~~. (Sinebot doesn't work here)
- (please sign at the END of your posts, not at the beginning!)
- 6) Posts must be coherent and civil.
I reserve the right to delete, without response, any and every posting from people unwilling or unable to obey these simple requests.Per this guideline.
If your post is in reference to an article, it would be greatly appreciated if you would provide a link to the article in question.
If you are here to tell me you changed or declined a speedy delete tag that you disagreed with, feel free to NOT leave me a note.
I respect your opinion, experience, and judgment on this matter.
I also irrevocably agreed to release my contributions under the GFDL, and that includes the speedy delete tags!
If you still feel that leaving a comment on one of these matter is truly necessary, I ask that you check the edit history of the article in question, and view the version of the page as it existed AT THE TIME I TAGGED IT, before leaving your comment. (Misplaced Pages is not a crystal ball, and I am not a psychic, and can not and will not be held responsible for actions that occurred after the fact).
Archives |
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Jaguar classed as non-notable software
Why have you considered my Jaguar articles non-notable software? We're not talking about the Halcyon or Konix Multisystem here, this console is a cult classic for the sake of... And I think many Jaguar fanboys would be deeply offended by the decision to class the Jaguar as non notable software. Bob_thegamepro Bob thegamepro (talk) 16:47, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Also Sega Dreamcast as above. Bob_thegamepro Bob thegamepro (talk) 17:27, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- My prod nominations have absolutely nothing to do with the systems the games ran on, but rather with a blatant lack of any indication of WP:NOTABILITY, on each and every one of your rubber stamped articles. Simply telling us it existed, isn't proving notability. WuhWuzDat 17:36, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Ok I will try and improve upon the problems listed by you're fair self. Bob_thegamepro Bob thegamepro (talk) 14:08, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Bentley & Skinner
I declined your speedy request on Bentley & Skinner, which you placed one minute after the article was created. If you thought the text was spammy, changing two words would have made it completely unspammy. Editing is always preferred to deletion.--Fabrictramp | talk to me 18:55, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- Editing something so obviously lacking in notability is an exercise in futility. AfD opened shortly before your comment posted above. WuhWuzDat 18:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- ...And, apparently, the AFD was closed as speedy keep. Multiple sources were added documenting notability, so the article looks to be compliant with policy - which is the whole point, after all. Thanks! UltraExactZZ ~ Did 03:15, 9 January 2010 (UTC)