This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Kim Bruning (talk | contribs) at 18:34, 28 January 2010 (Maybe we can move towards consensus?). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 18:34, 28 January 2010 by Kim Bruning (talk | contribs) (Maybe we can move towards consensus?)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff) | This user has asked for Wikipedians to give her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on her edits at Misplaced Pages:Editor review/Multixfer. |
I regularly clear old discussions from this talkpage. It's allowed under policy.
| This is Multixfer's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments. |
|
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 18 January 2010
- News and notes: Statistics, disasters, Misplaced Pages's birthday and more
- In the news: Misplaced Pages on the road, and more
- WikiProject report: Where are they now?
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 25 January 2010
- BLP madness: BLP deletions cause uproar
- Births and deaths: Misplaced Pages biographies in the 20th century
- News and notes: Biographies galore, Wikinews competition, and more
- In the news: Misplaced Pages the disruptor?
- WikiProject report: Writers wanted! The Wikiproject Novels interviews
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Maybe we can move towards consensus?
Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/JWASM#Can_we_tackle_this_by_widening_the_article
I noticed you were adding some comments to the top of the conversation, assuming that no reliable sources could be found.
However, near the bottom we found that we could probably get enough notability if we expanded the scope of the article to also include WASM. Would you be willing to take a careful look and comment on whether that approach would work?