Misplaced Pages

Ngô Sĩ Liên

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Hebrides (talk | contribs) at 16:46, 3 February 2010 (clean up, typos fixed: establisment → establishment, commited → committed using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 16:46, 3 February 2010 by Hebrides (talk | contribs) (clean up, typos fixed: establisment → establishment, commited → committed using AWB)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Ngô Sĩ Liên
OccupationRoyal historian
LanguageVietnamese, Hán tự
PeriodLê Dynasty
GenreHistoriography
Notable worksĐại Việt sử ký toàn thư

Ngô Sĩ Liên (Hán tự: , ?–?) was an historian of the Lê Dynasty. He is best-known for being the principal compiler of the Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư, a comprehensive chronicle of the history of Vietnam and the oldest official historical record of a Vietnamese dynasty that remains today.

History

The exact dates of Ngô Sĩ Liên's birth and date are unknown but it was said that he was born in the Chúc Lý village, Ngọc Sơn commune of Chương Đức district, Sơn Nam (now Chương Mỹ, Hanoi. In his youth, Ngô Sĩ Liên participated in the Lam Sơn uprising of Lê Lợi that led to the retreat of the Ming Dynasty and the foundation of the Lê Dynasty in Vietnam. In the 1442 imperial examination of the Lê Dynasty, Ngô Sĩ Liên gained the title Doctorate (Tiến sĩ) and thus became an official in the royal court of three successive emperors Lê Thái Tông (1434–1442), Lê Nhân Tông (1442–1459) and Lê Thánh Tông (1460–1497), during the latter's reign, Ngô Sĩ Liên was appointed Director of the National Bureau for Historical Record (Viện Quốc sử) in 1473. According to some sources, Ngô Sĩ Liên lived up to the age of 99, therefore he was likely born around 1400 and died during the late period of Lê Thánh Tông's reign.

Works

See also: Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư

Ngô Sĩ Liên's major work is the historical record Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư, a 15-volume (quyển) book that he compiled in revising Đại Việt sử ký of Lê Văn Hưu and Đại Việt sử ký tục biên of Phan Phu Tiên. During the reign of Lê Thánh Tông, the emperor had commissioned his historians to write an official chronicle for the dynasty in the Quang Thuận period (1460–1469), this work was later lost but after Thánh Tông's order, Ngô Sĩ Liên, a member of the board of compilation, wrote his own version in 1479 which was finally resulted in the Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư.

Ngô Sĩ Liên's style of compilation showed an important influence from Sima Guang, the author of the Zizhi Tongjian. Different than his predecessors, Ngô Sĩ Liên did not limit his references in official documents related to history but he also extracted information from Việt điện u linh tập (Compilation of the potent spirits in the Realm of Việt) and Lĩnh Nam chính quái (Extraordinary stories of Lĩnh Nam) which were collections of folk legend and myth but considered by the historian having some credibility about history. Another innovation of Ngô Sĩ Liên is his division of history of Vietnam into two principal periods, he placed all events that happened before the establishment of the Đinh Dynasty in Peripheral Records (Ngoại kỷ) while the independent time from the Đinh Dynasty (10th century) to the creation of the Lê Dynasty in 1482 was narrated in Basic Records (Bản kỷ). In addition, Ngô Sĩ Liên also compiled another three records for the reigns of Lê Thái Tổ, Lê Thái Tông and Lê Nhân Tông (1428–1459) in a separate volume named Tam triều bản kỷ (Records of the Three Reigns).

From his extensive 72 comments in Đại Việt sử ký toàn thư, Ngô Sĩ Liên appeared to be a Neo-Confucianist scholar. He often quoted from Cofucian literature in criticizing an event or a decision of the previous dynasties that, according to Ngô Sĩ Liên, did not follow the Confucian codes for an appropriate ruling institution. According to O. W. Wolters, Ngô Sĩ Liên respected the Confucianist perspective to the extend that the highest praise he could lavish on a Vietnamese ruler was that his achievements could not be bettered by even the most famous Chinese emperors in antiquity. However, the criticism and often harsh remarks of Ngô Sĩ Liên towards previous dynasties, especially the Trần Dynasty, could be understood as the historian's concern for the current dynasty, because the Lê Dynasty would fall into collapse unless it could avoid the mistakes that were committed by its predecessors like the Trần Dynasty. Besides, the historian paid attention in defining the identity of the nation, a typical example of this intention was the existence of the Hồng Bàng Dynasty in Peripheral Records, Ngô Sĩ Liên's introduction of this dynasty was challenged by several historians for the lack of information and the real motive of the historian in writing about Hùng Kings. Some remarked that Ngô Sĩ Liên made Hồng Bàng Dynasty the first dynasty of Vietnam only because he wanted to emphasize the identity and the independence of Vietnam from China.

References

Notes

  1. ^ Tuyet Nhung Tran, Anthony J. S. Reid 2006, p. 56
  2. ^ Taylor 1991, p. 358
  3. ^ "Ngô Sĩ Liên" (in Vietnamese). Từ điển Bách khoa toàn thư Việt Nam. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  4. ^ Anthony Reid, Kristine Alilunas-Rodgers 2001, p. 94 Cite error: The named reference "Rodgers94" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  5. Keith Weller Taylor, John K. Whitmore 1995, p. 125
  6. Anthony Reid, Kristine Alilunas-Rodgers 2001, p. 95
  7. Keith Weller Taylor, John K. Whitmore 1995, p. 126
  8. Georg G. Iggers, Q. Edward Wang, Supriya Mukherjee (2008). A global history of modern historiography. Pearson Education. p. 57. ISBN 0582096065.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  9. Wolters, O. W. (1999). History, culture, and region in Southeast Asian perspectives. SEAP Publications. p. 144. ISBN 0877277257.
  10. Gisèle Luce Bousquet, Pierre Brocheux (2002). Viêt Nam exposé: French scholarship on twentieth-century Vietnamese society. University of Michigan Press. p. 103. ISBN 0472068059.
  11. Pelley, Patricia M. (2002). Postcolonial Vietnam: new histories of the national past. Duke University Press. p. 65.

Bibliography

Categories: