Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Monshuai (talk | contribs) at 21:08, 15 February 2010 (→Stop canvassing!). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Awards stuff

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		I have looked at your contributions and you have made many edits recently therefore you deserve the Tireless Contributor Barsntar. Well done and keep up the good work. Regards IJA (talk) 23:18, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

		The Content Creativity Barnstar
		On your contribution, creating tons of articles of quality in wikipedia. Because an encyclopedia needs real contributors with scientific knowledge. Keep up the excellent work!--74.59.88.57 (talk) 01:22, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

		The Barnstar of Diplomacy
		You deserve this barnstar because you got the patience I don't.74.59.88.57 (talk) 03:42, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I have to remind you that your topic ban in Kosovo related articles and discussions is still active and I kindly ask you to close your recently filled afd case.Alexikoua (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

I appreciate your gently reminder. I take the ban very seriously and I am respecting it. However, as explained in the AfD, I nominated the article because according to this version () Serbs were also persecuted by Albania and Croatia, other than Kosovo. Kosovo may be present in the article, but as an active member of the Albania task force I have to take care of the Albania project. However if any admin deems that my nomination is a break of the Kosovo topic ban, then I will cancel the nomination. sulmues (talk) --Sulmues 22:04, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi Sulumes. As an uninvolved admin, I hope you won't mind me dropping in on this.

As you say, Kosovo isn't the specific focus of the article, but it's still involved even if other topics are as well. I think this is enough to count as "Kosovo-related", and deletion is certainly getting involved with the article. As such, I think it's best for you to withdraw the nomination and let it be for now.

If the article's bad enough to need deletion, then I'm sure someone else will list it in the fullness of time. There's no need for you to push the boundaries of your ban just to get it done now rather than waiting for someone else! Shimgray | talk | 22:18, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Cancelled! Since you feel like there is a conflict of interest... sulmues (talk)--Sulmues 22:20, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the recognition. Unfortunately, I haven't been able to make further edits recently, but I have plans for many more.--Gaius Claudius Nero (talk) 23:37, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Stop canvassing!

Running around canvassing users who you think may support your POV is entirely unacceptable and you will be reported for this. I have warned you in the past to not do so, but apparently your desire to spite is so intense you just don't care. Athenean (talk) 20:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

What is with you Athenean and trying to stop people from sharing their perspectives? Sulmues, you should know that Athenean has now also asked for your ban in WP:ANI right below the comment you posted to oppose the request for my ban. I also want to thank you for your help by sharing your opinion. I truly believe that it is possible to neutralize double standards and the attemts at suppression of reliable sources. I know that my English is not always at the highest fluency level, but thank you for making the compliment.--Monshuai (talk) 21:05, 15 February 2010 (UTC)