This is an old revision of this page, as edited by PanchoS (talk | contribs) at 13:14, 16 February 2010. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 13:14, 16 February 2010 by PanchoS (talk | contribs)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Tagging of Prolly
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Prolly. I do not think that Prolly fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because This doesn't look like vandalism to me, but merely an inappropriate page. i have tagged it with Prod instead. I request that you consider not re-tagging Prolly for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES 03:49, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Tagging of Jordyn Jackson
I recently removed a speedy delete tag that you had placed on Jordyn Jackson. I do not think that Jordyn Jackson fits any of the speedy deletion criteria because Having released multiple albums is a claim of significance, posibly not sufficient at AfD but enough to avoid an ] speedy. I request that you consider not re-tagging Jordyn Jackson for speedy deletion without discussing the matter on the appropriate talk page. DES 03:56, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Tagging of Shiddukhin for speedy deletion
In this edit you tagged Shiddukhin for speedy deletion under WP:CSD#A1. But A1 specifically says "This applies only to very short articles." and the page was at that time 7,303 bytes long. It also said "This article incorporates text from the 1901–1906 Jewish Encyclopedia article 'marriage'" which seems to give plenty of context to me. Particularly for an article created less than 2 minutes earlier, this seems in incorrect use of this speedy deletion tag. Please be more careful in future. DES 04:08, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, but now I'm really close to reporting you to the Administrator's noticeboard. Taking a look into your records you keep archived at "/dev/null":
- you're tagging uncountable articles for speedy deletion, inadequately referring to the speedy deletion criteria. Some of these articles are fortunately detagged or recovered later, which anyway means additional work for others plus deterrence for new contributors.
- you keep tagging articles for speedy deletion right after creation, which is to be avoided per WP:CSD
- you keep offending and harrassing users, see this case: "Oh, and you're trying to hide all the evidence? VERY bad newbie. I'll be keeping an eye on your edits. If you remove DB tags again, you will be blocked from editing." directed to a user who removed the obviously insane Speedy Deletion tag from his page. Sure, it wasn't okay to remove the tag, but this absolutely no reason to attack him like this nor to utter a threat you're not entitled to. "hiding the evidence" is a false allegation. "VERY bad newbie" is a personal attack in breach of WP:NPA
- you keep instructing people in an overly didactic tone, often giving wrong instructions, e.g. : "we can use {{hangon}} then, can't we?" (wrong information, yet arrogantly didactic)
We all make mistakes, and once in a while we might even go too far in respect to this or that. The difference is that you are being continuosly contradicted, criticized, warned, but you don't seem to care at all. You don't seem to care about your numerous errors, so obviously you don't care about the rules. You not even seem to care about people you offend, that do feel offended and even complain about being offended.
This making it very hard to keep assuming good faith, so it's no surprise that you're being called "a meance and a danger to the project" by one of your victims. If you keep on doing like this, I will tend to agree. However, at the moment please understand this as a well-intentioned warning as I do see at the same time that you're doing good work as well.