User talk:Multixfer - Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Phantomsteve (talk | contribs) at 23:15, 16 February 2010 (→Editor Review: done: ). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 23:15, 16 February 2010 by Phantomsteve (talk | contribs) (→Editor Review: done: )(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This user has asked for Wikipedians to give her feedback at an editor review. You may comment on her edits at Misplaced Pages:Editor review/Multixfer.

I regularly clear old discussions from this talkpage. It's allowed under policy.

This is Multixfer's talk page, where you can send her messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Dear Kenn, stop leaving your "commentaries" on my talk and user pages.

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 8 February 2010

News and notes: Commons at 6 million, BLP taskforce, milestones and more

In the news: Robson Revisions, Rumble in the Knesset, and more

Dispatches: Fewer reviewers in 2009

WikiProject report: WikiProject Olympics

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 02:58, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 15 February 2010

News and notes: New Georgia Encyclopedia, BLPs, Ombudsmen, and more

In the news: Labor squeeze revisited, journalist consultations, philosophy bungles, and more

WikiProject report: WikiProject Singapore

Features and admins: Approved this week

Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 13:16, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Editor Review: done

I have done an editor review for you at Misplaced Pages:Editor review/Multixfer.

Perhaps you could consider doing a review of another editor? It takes a bit of time (reviews can take anywhere from about 15 minutes up to 2 hours, depending on how many contributions the editor has made, where they have contributed, etc).

The ones marked with a * are those editors who have not been reviewed yet — if you want to review one of these, make sure you remove the asterisks in the parts indicated!

If you have not done a review before, you might feel more comfortable giving a second review to an editor — this will show you an example of a review that has been done, and show you the kinds of things that can be commented on. I hope that you find the review useful. Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions about it.

Regards, -- PhantomSteve/talk|contribs\ 23:15, 16 February 2010 (UTC)