This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mysidia (talk | contribs) at 06:16, 15 January 2006 (→Support). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 06:16, 15 January 2006 by Mysidia (talk | contribs) (→Support)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)SimonP
I'm quite interested in helping with Arbcom, but I have hesitated to put my name forward as I am reluctant to hand myself over to a selection process that doesn't yet seem to exist.
I've been a Wikipedians since December 2001 and have been an admin since December 2003 (which by extrapolation means that something good has to happen in December 2005). I currently have the distinction of being number one on the List of Wikipedians by number of edits. Sheer number of edits is a pretty meaningless statistic, but it does show that I have a fair amount of time to dedicate to the project.
I follow Arbcom fairly closely, but have only participated directly in only a couple of cases. I feel that in almost all cases the committee does its job admirably, though its speed is, as has often been noted, is sometimes far slower than ideal.
Support
- Support --Doc 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. David | explanation | Talk 00:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Owen× ☎ 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Ambi 00:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Michael Snow 00:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support without reservations. – Quadell 00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Antandrus (talk) 00:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- – ugen64 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Cryptic (talk) 00:20, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- —Kirill Lokshin 00:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Without question.--Sean|Black 00:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --GraemeL 00:43, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- PRueda29 / / 00:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- --Jaranda 00:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Carbonite | Talk 01:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support.--Bookandcoffee 01:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Tony Sidaway|Talk 01:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- JYolkowski // talk 01:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- --nixie 01:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- TacoDeposit 01:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. An outstanding editor, admin and (hopefully soon to be) arbitrator. Batmanand 01:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Duk 01:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support definitely experienced --Angelo 01:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support —Ruud 02:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Trustworthy editor. Xoloz 02:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, the biggest surprise is that there are opposers. Croat Canuck 02:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Likely to be more moderate than some. Grace Note 02:47, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Shanes 02:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- King of All the Franks 03:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Guettarda 03:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Jord 03:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - BanyanTree 03:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Fred Bauder 03:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support 172 04:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Congrats, you spend way too much time on Misplaced Pages.--ragesoss 04:12, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Wile E. Heresiarch 04:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Bobet 04:23, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support freestylefrappe 04:26, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- —Charles P. (Mirv) 04:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Dottore So 04:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Zach 04:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Daniel 05:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --Aaron 05:16, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Christopher Parham (talk) 05:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. gren グレン 05:50, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--cj | talk 06:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. android79 06:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Chick Bowen 06:36, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Wetman 07:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. -newkai | talk | contribs 07:21, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. — Catherine\ 07:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Jiang 07:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Fabricationary 07:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Alhutch 07:29, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 07:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Can't believe this - somebody has opposed this user! utcursch | talk 07:57, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, hoping that his superb work in the article namespace wouldn't suffer from being an arbitrator. — mark ✎ 08:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Akamad 08:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Cmouse 09:00, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support experience, questions --- Charles Stewart 09:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support mister wikipedia. --MPerel 09:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --Kefalonia 09:51, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. — Saxifrage | ☎ 10:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Terence Ong 10:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, a no-nonsense user. Dan100 (Talk) 11:07, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 12:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- —Nightstallion (?) 12:42, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --Roisterer 12:54, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Meekohi 13:24, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support I really like this guy, he shows clear judgement and logical thinking. ALKIVAR™ 13:31, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support mdmanser 14:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support per opposition, although I worry that ArbCom duties might interfere with productivity on the rest of the project... Tomer 14:10, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support I've seen this user doing some bad VfD decisions, but otherwise he's quite solid candidate. Grue 14:14, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, sound of judgment. Radiant_>|< 14:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Proto t c 15:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --Habap 16:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support moderate, reasonable, and has loads of experience. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 16:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. the wub "?!" 16:19, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- — Dunc|☺ 16:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - dedicated to wikipedia. Skeezix1000 17:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Rhion 17:53, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --kingboyk 18:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --OntarioQuizzer 19:04, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support --CDN99 19:30, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support May you do all you can for wikipedia --metta, The Sunborn 19:58, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Level headed with right priorities - Xed 20:09, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support TestPilot 20:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Donar Reiskoffer 20:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support TerraGreen 20:28, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support great user - solid editor, balanced. --Loopy 20:55, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support No objection whatsoever ℬastique▼♥♑ 21:08, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Aldux 21:41, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. One of the first Wikipedians, I'm certain he'll arbitrate with experience and wiki-wisdom. --KHill-LTown 21:46, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Haukur 21:48, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 22:01, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. —Quarl 2006-01-09 22:23Z
- Support - Though I'd agree w/ Novacatz about your absence in the admin pages. I trust you. Cheers Szvest 23:05, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- If this is really what you want to do I guess you can count on my support - although as I mentioned I think this is going to take up a lot more of your time then you think it will. WhiteNight 01:34, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Splash 23:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support: RENTASTRAWBERRY röck 23:18, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Confuzion 23:27, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support easiest vote in the lot of 'em. Smmurphy 23:33, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support per Wetman and others. --Ghirla | talk 23:35, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --Stbalbach 00:11, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Maltmomma 02:37, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Andrew_pmk | Talk 02:40, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- older≠wiser 02:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Dlyons493 Talk 03:36, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Rossami (talk) 03:47, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support –Abe Dashiell 05:32, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Trusted.--cjllw | TALK 06:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --Interiot 07:31, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --DanielNuyu 07:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Willmcw/user:Will Beback/10:14, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Delirium 10:25, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support SchmuckyTheCat 11:43, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 12:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- —It's-is-not-a-genitive 13:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - An excellent editor --Reflex Reaction (talk)• 15:57, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, questions. See my vote rationale. Talrias (t | e | c) 18:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--The Brain 18:09, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. howcheng {chat} 18:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --Raistlin 19:28, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Ral315 (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Thue | talk 20:01, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. --G Rutter 20:55, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Big support, with bells on Oskar 20:59, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Solipsist 21:42, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Seems to have the time to commit. No character or behaviour flaws contrary to ArbCom seem to have been exposed. --Ds13 22:51, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support as per 172. Phil Sandifer 23:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Strongly support. SimonP is a good editor who seeks consensus, assumes good faith and is overall a great credit to wikipedia. He would be an excellent AbCom member. -SocratesJedi | Talk 00:04, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support The man has experience--Berndd11222 00:47, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. HollyAm 01:46, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support (Note: Vote only reflects suitability of candidate to the role, and does not reflect overall contributions or personally.) - Mailer Diablo 02:08, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. siafu 04:59, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Karl Meier 09:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- --Bhadani 09:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--R.D.H. (Ghost In The Machine) 10:57, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Punkmorten 12:35, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--JK the unwise 12:39, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Syrthiss 13:34, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--Gozar 17:42, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support--A Y Arktos 20:16, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support User brings long-term Misplaced Pages experience --Rye1967 21:10, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - Strong belief that this user is a distinguished neutral. BDAbramson T 21:15, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support has the experience V8rik 19:43, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, very experienced. — Ian Manka 20:21, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Fad (ix) 20:23, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support - I have worked with this user before, he would be a good choice. --NorkNork 21:29, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support -- Ze miguel 09:02, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, and allow for organic growth. ;-) Bahn Mi 19:17, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Fred-Chess 19:45, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Would do well on the Committee. Good luck. Agent Blightsoot 23:10, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support, has knowledge of process, a good and trustworthy editor all round -- Francs2000 00:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. maclean25 00:13, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Rohirok 02:37, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Lee S. Svoboda tɑk 17:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support Marskell 17:33, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Mushroom 01:09, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. Evidence --JWSchmidt 01:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. *drew 03:19, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- Support. (SEWilco 05:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC))
- Support. --Mysidia (talk) 06:16, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Oppose
- Oppose --Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 02:02, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose —Bunchofgrapes (talk) 02:37, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose: Does not go renegade, but has circumvented process, in my experience, and ArbCom needs the most legal and careful people. Nothing against the person, just against this position. Geogre 11:17, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. --HK 23:25, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose, I have seen worryingly tendentious AFD closures by this user. Bishonen | talk 00:10, 10 January 2006 (UTC).
- Oppose, with wooden stakes, garlic, silver bullets, etc. Position on fancruct intolerable. Avriette 06:34, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Oppose, though a prolific editor, have not seen evidence of much previous involvement with community, a must for an arbitrator. HGB 19:19, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Have seen be too doctrinaire and unreasonable to be suited for ArbCom; conduct on Republic and its relatives particularly troublesome. Septentrionalis 19:38, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Candidate statement inadequate for appointment as arbitrator, as does not address nature of arbitration. Fifelfoo 21:53, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. Saravask 23:56, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. enochlau (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. --Masssiveego 07:45, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Astrotrain 21:28, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose jni 08:42, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose-- Davidpdx 12:14, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose Dr. B 18:13, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Oppose. I'm not usually a single issue guy, but I was disappointed in your mocking lack of regard for the consensus question. Velvetsmog 01:32, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Regretfully Oppose. why? ++Lar: t/c 02:11, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
- --Boothy443 | trácht ar 06:01, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
Neutral
- Neutral Editing record is excellent and I like your responses -- however, I have not heard of you at all on admin pages. Just can't say without more info. novacatz 05:06, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Strong Neutral - I've never heard of him. Which is kinda surprising if he has more edits that anyone else. Otherwise, sounds like a great candidate. --Phroziac . o º 05:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- Neutral --Crunch 05:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
- - Vote Signed By: Chazz- Place comments here
- Neutral Good editing record, but statement doesn't say much about why he's running or what he'd do. --William Pietri 23:21, 14 January 2006 (UTC)