This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Off2riorob (talk | contribs) at 17:17, 10 April 2010 (delete). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 17:17, 10 April 2010 by Off2riorob (talk | contribs) (delete)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Christopher Ashlee
- Christopher Ashlee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unsourced BLP. May fail WP:PORNBIO - There is no reference to establish that he won the award. EuroPride (talk) 15:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:19, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep passes PORNBIO - the previous source was deleted and not replaced as can be seen in the page history. One suitable reference is http://www.grabbys.com/PastWinners.html and the award itself is described with other potential source material at Grabby Award and Grabby recipients. In this case a tag for improving references would have been more appropriate than raising for deletion. Ash (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Considering the repeated deletion of sources, including grabby.com, I thought the following may be useful in resolving the issue:
- http://business.avn.com/articles/34692.html - an independent report on the original nominations explicitly naming Ashlee.
- http://grabbys.com/nominations-2009.html - click on "All" or "Scenes" to see full listing with Ashlee named.
- http://www.xbiz.com/avi/101369 - XBIZ listing for BlackBalled6 showing full cast. This listing is not promotional for any particular reseller.
- Ash (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Considering the repeated deletion of sources, including grabby.com, I thought the following may be useful in resolving the issue:
- Keep per Ash. He co-won a Grabby Award and passes WP:PORNBIO. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
- Keep per Ash. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 04:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete since there is no in depth coverage of this person, anywhere, fails BIO and GNG.Bali ultimate (talk) 15:41, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment: Please note that 4 resources have been added. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:08, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- None of them a reliable source. Retail wanking sites and wanking-fan blogs aren't reliable sources.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- How about the grabby site itself, which has now been added? 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:19, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- None of them a reliable source. Retail wanking sites and wanking-fan blogs aren't reliable sources.Bali ultimate (talk) 16:10, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete as unsourced and non-notable. Porn sites as cites do not cut it. Jack Merridew 16:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- What about the grabby site itself? 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:20, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- I see. You want to include porn references, as long as they're not porn references. Is that right? The grabby site stands, if none other. This performer won that award. Do you have a particular POV that you want this excluded? 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- That award doesn't mean boo and your link doesn't even mention this fellow. If I've a PoV here, it's that articles require proper sources that discuss their subjects in depth. Jack Merridew 16:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- I'm sorry you don't think the award doesn't mean boo, but you may want to check http://en.wikipedia.org/Grabby_Awards for the full history, verifying that, indeed, it does mean boo. 207.237.230.164 (talk) 16:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- Delete:::There is just no coverage to ever create a well rounded informative biography of this person. Off2riorob (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
- That award doesn't mean boo and your link doesn't even mention this fellow. If I've a PoV here, it's that articles require proper sources that discuss their subjects in depth. Jack Merridew 16:31, 10 April 2010 (UTC)