Misplaced Pages

Anecdotal evidence

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 213.130.141.22 (talk) at 02:23, 3 February 2006 (rv replacement with unwikified essay by known POV pusher). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 02:23, 3 February 2006 by 213.130.141.22 (talk) (rv replacement with unwikified essay by known POV pusher)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Anecdotal evidence is a term used in medical, scientific and legal discourse to refer to evidence, typically in the form of isolated anecdotes, describing an event that occurred under uncontrolled conditions.

Anecdotal evidence may be true (for instance, the existence of the giant squid was originally anecdotal). However, it is viewed with caution, as personal testimony is subject to cognitive bias; and even if it is true, there is no way to know if a single data point represents the trend for the data or is an exception (an outlier).

It commonly arises in the form of the fallacy of faulty generalization: for instance, "My grandmother lived to 95, smoked constantly, and didn't die of lung cancer" may be taken as evidence that smoking does not cause lung cancer.

While not conclusive in itself, multiply-corroborated anecdotal evidence may provide the basis for more rigorous investigation. For example, anecdotal testimony commonly forms part of the evidence for discrimination lawsuits, and may be sufficient to initiate a class action.

References

External Links

See also

Category: