Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Locke Cole (talk | contribs) at 23:47, 2 February 2006 (rm fair-use images used in violation of WP:FU). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Oh my god... I've discovered the antichrist is alive on Misplaced Pages.

Category:If templates
Category:Boolean templates

Interesting topics:

• Logical fallacy

WikiPhilosophy:

• /Admins
• /Articles
• /Rescued from Category:Candidates for speedy deletion

Useful pages:

• Misplaced Pages:Policies and guidelines
• Special:Newpages
• Special:Specialpages
• Newbie contribs

Items I am watching over:

• Special:Recentchangeslinked/List of collectible card games
• Category:Game stubs
• Category:Occupations
• Special:Whatlinkshere/Bad title

Other links

• Archive of wikien-l

Hilarity ensues

• Skateboarding trick
• "honk honk here comes the banmobile"
• User:Dmn(*) says goodbye in his own special way - Get A Life You Nob (see contribs from Dec 31 2004)
• It's important to warn users
• "Human should be a disambig page."
• I thought the page was using protection!

Ideas

Netoholic's Law

As a wiki discussion grows longer, the probability of an accusation by one user of another acting unilaterally approaches one.

Look, I've made thousands of "unilateral" edits, so probably have you. It's a wiki. Get over it.

Corollary

One can substitute any of the following for "unilaterally", and the law still works -- "against consensus", "mindlessly", "carelessly". Any of these words indicates you might be facing off against a wiki-warrior.

Other wisdom

• The opposite of deletionism is not inclusionism; rather, the opposite is contribution.

• Misplaced Pages:Ignore all rules is a paradox. One is expressly failing to "ignore all rules" by citing WP:IAR.
  In other words, if you do something and justify it with IAR, you are implicitly acknowledging that there are rules.

Scratchpad

• edit
• purge

Barnstars