Misplaced Pages

Intellectual dishonesty

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Son of Somebody (talk | contribs) at 08:58, 2 September 2010 (removing a dead link & a link which doesn't support a definition). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 08:58, 2 September 2010 by Son of Somebody (talk | contribs) (removing a dead link & a link which doesn't support a definition)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Intellectual dishonesty is dishonesty in performing intellectual activities like thought or communication. Examples are:

  • the advocacy of a position which the advocate knows or believes to be false or misleading
  • the advocacy of a position which the advocate does not know to be true, and has not performed rigorous due diligence to ensure the truthfulness of the position
  • the conscious omission of aspects of the truth known or believed to be relevant in the particular context.

Rhetoric is used to advance an agenda or to reinforce one's deeply held beliefs in the face of overwhelming contrary evidence. If a person is aware of the evidence and agrees with the conclusion it portends, yet advocates a contradictory view, they commit intellectual dishonesty. If the person is unaware of the evidence, their position is ignorance, even if in agreement with the scientific conclusion. If the person is knowingly aware that there may be additional evidence but purposefully fails to check, and then acts as though the position is confirmed, this is also intellectual dishonesty.

The terms intellectually dishonest and intellectual dishonesty are often used as rhetorical devices in a debate; the label invariably frames an opponent in a negative light.

The phrase is also frequently used by orators when a debate foe or audience reaches a conclusion varying from the speaker's on a given subject. This appears mostly in debates or discussions of speculative, non-scientific issues, such as morality or policy.

See also

In specific fields

Other

Footnotes

  1. "Intellectual dishonesty (in philosophy)". Enlexica, Inc. 2008-07-01. Retrieved 2008-07-16.
Stub icon

This philosophy-related article is a stub. You can help Misplaced Pages by expanding it.

Categories: