This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GoodDay (talk | contribs) at 19:23, 19 November 2010 (→Exceptional individuals wanted for challenging two-year assignment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
Revision as of 19:23, 19 November 2010 by GoodDay (talk | contribs) (→Exceptional individuals wanted for challenging two-year assignment)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)Shortcuts
|
Archives |
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Changes in Checkuser/Oversight permissions
My thanks to Mackensen, Vassyana and Luna for their contribution. I appreciate that the Committee is keeping an eye on this situation and taking appropriate steps. Skomorokh 22:22, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Concerning that it appears we burned out Vassyana and Luna, who I have immense respect for. Thanks for all you two were able to do over the years.
- Mackensen, thanks, and looking forwards to more great content. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:48, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Alas, people come and go, but all the more unfortunate when the trustworthy disappear. bibliomaniac15 02:51, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Arbitration motion regarding Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Speed of light
Exceptional individuals wanted for challenging two-year assignment
You are:
Y an effective communicator with a sound grasp of policy;
Y able to see all aspects of a problem and find solutions;
Y courteous, disciplined and open-minded;
Y able to deal calmly with trolls, bigots and editors with issues;
Y able to make up your own mind under stress.
If you can answer "yes" to most of the above, you are probably arbitrator material. Learn more about standing in the upcoming election. But don't delay, nominations close very soon!
Tony (talk) 16:31, 19 November 2010 (UTC), for the election coordinators
- PS: YYou must also be able to prove your real name (with a copy of your passport) to "The Office" in case any litigation as a result of your actions arise. Giacomo 17:38, 19 November 2010 (UTC).
- A discussion about this thread has been opened at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#I'm loth to say "censorship" but... ╟─TreasuryTag►high seas─╢ 19:12, 19 November 2010 (UTC)
- With the exception of ..grasp of policy, I'm afirmative on the other points. PS: Nobody's' is going to know my real name or see my passport; No way, Jose. GoodDay (talk) 19:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)