Misplaced Pages

User talk:Flowerparty

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by RL0919 (talk | contribs) at 21:24, 9 July 2011 (Notification of suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity using AWB). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Revision as of 21:24, 9 July 2011 by RL0919 (talk | contribs) (Notification of suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity using AWB)(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Template:Nothere


Archives

1, 2


This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

Leave a message

T4T Article deletion

After viewing this show on a DVD I purchased, I went to look up more on it in Misplaced Pages. There are several failed Adult Swim pilots (Korgoth) and several upcoming/unreleased pilots (Cheyenne) like T4T which have articles. Is there any reason why this one was deleted and those aren't? I was planning on starting the article but I figured I'd let you know beforehand. Please get back to me Theornamentalist (talk) 23:03, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

OpenInkpot article

You have deleted OpenInkpot article some time ago due to lack of reliable sources. Right, there were no sources back then. Some articles were written since:

I'm not sure is it enough to show the notability, but worth a try :) --MikhailGusarov (talk) 18:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

a deleted page

Why is the page on Frost & Sullivan deleted? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Neildave405 (talk • contribs) 15:32, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

I've taken a look at it, and it was deleted because it was written more like a promotional advertisement than a neutral encyclopedia article. Previous versions were deleted for straightforward copyright violations. If you think this is a notable company, and an article can be written in a neutral manner, I will happily restore it to your userspace so you can work on it. Please drop me a note here if you would like to do this. Rodhullandemu 15:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Grinderswitch

Hello Flowerparty, this is a message from an automated bot to inform you that the page you created on April 16 2008, Grinderswitch, has been marked for speedy deletion by User:86.180.248.183 (page has mainspace links, and 8 edits). This has been done because the page seems to be about a person, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant (see CSD). If you think the tag was placed in error, please add "{{hangon}}" to the page text, and edit the talk page to explain why the page should not be deleted. If you have a question about this bot, please ask it at User talk:SDPatrolBot II. If you have a question for the user who tagged the article, see User talk:86.180.248.183. Thanks, - SDPatrolBot II (talk) on behalf of 86.180.248.183 (talk · contribs) 21:00, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

kirk lombard article deletion

i'm interested in reading what was deleted about kirk lombard. no axe to grind about the deletion, just want to see what was there. any way to do this? thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.143.3.90 (talk) 18:48, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Suspension of admin privileges due to inactivity

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Misplaced Pages:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:24, 9 July 2011 (UTC)