Misplaced Pages

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Demiurge1000 (talk | contribs) at 18:35, 23 December 2010 (→Comments by other users: reply to accusation of being a sockpuppet). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

– This SPI case is open.

Daedalus969

Daedalus969 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Daedalus969/Archive.

23 December 2010

Suspected sockpuppets

• Demiurge1000 (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

• User compare report Auto-generated every six hours.

Please list evidence below this line. Remember to sign at the end of your section with 4 tilde characters "~~~~"

First time I have heard about user:Demiurge1000 (the account was created less than a 6 months ago) was today, when the user has suggested blocking me for absolutely nothing. The the user went canvasing. I run wikistalk on the users. Here's what I got IMO the post on AN/I, requesting blocking me on a more than unwarranted accusation, canvasing and wiki stalk report are enough evidence to run SPI Mbz1 (talk) 18:03, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Lol. I didn't do this. Feel free to CU me. All this really is is harassment since Mbz1 can't have her block of me she requested at ANI.— Dædαlus 18:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

"First time I have heard about user:Demiurge1000 (the account was created less than a 6 months ago) was today" ....... blatantly not true, as can be seen at my talk page: User_talk:Demiurge1000#Users_talk_page_guidelines where Mbz1 chose to lecture me (incorrectly) about talk page guidelines a few weeks ago.

In a separate incident, I have also posted on Mbz1's talk page explaining something to her that she had asked about, for which she thanked me and removed the comment (as seems to be her policy). I can dig out a diff for that if needed.

Also, Mbz1's statement that my account was created less than six months ago, is also untrue (this is easy to check.)

The wikistalk report is extremely amusing. Yes, Daedalus and I both post to noticeboards and both post to other editors' talk pages. I doubt we share opinions on arbitrary actions of deities towards kittens, but I'd have to check that.

Of all the many dozens of articles I edit (approximately 1000 edits to mainspace in just over six months), I somehow doubt that Daedalus shares an interest in many of them. (Actually I have no idea what his editing interests are, I will go and look.)

I don't even have Daedalus' talk page on my watchlist (as I have lots of other editors) until about one minute ago when I added it as a result of this SPI.

I have not ever edited Misplaced Pages with any other account than this one.

I consider this to be a frivolous and bad faith SPI request intended as retaliation for my raising concerns about Mbz1's behaviour at ANI. I do value my privacy so I am requesting the SPI/checkuser be declined. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

• Open SPI cases
• SPI cases awaiting administration
• SPI cases awaiting review